The document is a court order scheduling Ghislain Maxwell's arraignment on April 23, 2021, and outli...
Summary
The document is a court order scheduling Ghislain Maxwell's arraignment on April 23, 2021, and outlining the COVID-19 protocols and public access arrangements for the proceeding. The court will provide a video feed and a public teleconference line to ensure additional public access. The order also requires the government and defense counsel to inform the court about the attendance plans of alleged victims and the defendant's family members.
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The court orders defense counsel to respond to the government's July 1, 2021 letter motion by July 9...
The court orders defense counsel to respond to the government's July 1, 2021 letter motion by July 9, 2021. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant.
Court Order: 214
The document is a court order scheduling Ghislain Maxwell's arraignment on April 23, 2021, and outlining the COVID-19 protocols and public access arrangements for the proceeding. The court will provide a video feed and a public teleconference line to ensure additional public access. The order also requires the government and defense counsel to inform the court about the attendance plans of alleged victims and the defendant's family members.
Court Order: 312
The court orders defense counsel to respond to the government's July 1, 2021 letter motion by July 9, 2021. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant.
court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00330 Document 101002 Filed 07/28/20 Page 24 of 36
The court filing discusses the defendant's ability to evade detection despite a bounty and media scrutiny, and defense counsel's failure to disclose her location to the Government. The court finds that detention is still appropriate due to the defendant's actions and defense counsel's interactions with the Government. The filing highlights the defendant's evasive behavior and the Government's efforts to locate and arrest her.
court filing: Case 1:20-cr-60838
The court filing discusses the defendant's ability to evade detection and law enforcement, despite a bounty and media scrutiny. The defense's arguments and evidence are deemed insufficient to counter the justification for detention, given the defendant's actions and defense counsel's interactions with the Government.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.