The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to...
Summary
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to the defense's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, citing the need to protect third-party privacy interests. The Court granted the request, ordering the Defendant and Boies Schiller to docket the documents with the proposed redactions.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file...
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file certain court documents under seal or with redactions to protect sensitive information. The government is submitting an unredacted version of their memorandum of law and exhibits in opposition to the defendant's pre-trial motions, while proposing redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy and the integrity of their investigation.
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defen...
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defendant's memorandum and seeking to file certain exhibits under seal to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties. The proposed redactions are justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government is submitting proposed redactions to the Court by email.
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudic...
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudicial than probative, and consisting of inadmissible hearsay. The government disputes the defendant's claims that Dr. Hall's opinions are admissible under various rules of evidence, and argues that the testimony is an attempt to attack Minor Victim-4's credibility without a valid basis.
The government filed a response to the defendant's letter requesting that her motion for a new trial...
The government filed a response to the defendant's letter requesting that her motion for a new trial and its exhibits be sealed. The government argues that the defendant's motion is a 'judicial document' subject to a presumption of public access and that sealing is not justified. The government also requests that the court adopt proposed redactions to the government's opposition brief to protect the privacy interests of prospective jurors.
The court has received the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Ghislaine Max...
The court has received the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Ghislaine Maxwell case and is requesting additional submissions from the government, the defendant, and victims before making a ruling. The court has outlined specific requirements for the government's memorandum of law and the submission of grand jury transcripts. The defendant's and victims' positions on the proposed disclosure are also due by August 5, 2025.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.