The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, ...
Summary
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten d...
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit, arguing that the additional depositions seek irrelevant and inadmissible evidence. Maxwell contends that the case is a simple defamation claim and that the plaintiff's attempts to introduce evidence about other alleged victims and Epstein's organization are extraneous and should not be allowed.
The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal ...
The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal case, citing concerns about the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The plaintiff argues that a stay would cause her harm due to ongoing effects of alleged abuse. The court weighs the interests of both parties in considering the request.
The document is a court filing in the case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defen...
The document is a court filing in the case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defendant is filing a motion to compel the plaintiff to disclose information about alleged ongoing criminal investigations or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings.
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a c...
The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.
This document is an exhibit filed in a court case, detailing a categorical log entry for approximate...
This document is an exhibit filed in a court case, detailing a categorical log entry for approximately 57 documents withheld due to public interest privilege, related to an ongoing criminal investigation. The plaintiff objected to the defendant's discovery requests as overly broad and burdensome. The log entry covers email and letter communications regarding the law enforcement investigation.
The document is a court filing in the case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defen...
The document is a court filing in the case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defendant responds to the plaintiff's motion to exceed the deposition limit. The defendant's attorneys, Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, argue against the motion. The case is being heard in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.