Case Filed-1229House OversightGhislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that allegations regarding Accuser-3 should be stricken ...
Unknown1p1 persons
Case File
d-1229House OversightGhislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that allegations regarding Accuser-3 should be stricken ...
Legal Filing
Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that allegations regarding Accuser-3 should be stricken from the superseding indictment because they are irrelevant and prejudicial. The government concedes that it cannot charge Maxwell with a substantive offense against Accuser-3 due to the statute of limitations and lack of evidence.
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1229
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
Advertisement
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.