The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and orders the unsealing of certai...
Summary
The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and orders the unsealing of certain documents related to her case, while allowing the parties to propose redactions to protect sensitive information. The court's reasoning is provided in a separate opinion filed under temporary seal. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2021.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approves Ghislaine Maxwell's proposed redactions ...
The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approves Ghislaine Maxwell's proposed redactions to her bail application reply, finding them narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The court applied the three-part Lugosch test to determine the appropriateness of the redactions. Maxwell is ordered to docket the redacted documents by December 23, 2020.
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating...
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating that the parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case do not propose any redactions to the court's June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order or certain exhibits. The parties have no objection to the public filing of these documents without redactions.
The defense attorney, Christian R. Everdell, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell d...
The defense attorney, Christian R. Everdell, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell does not seek redactions to the Court's sealed Opinion and Order or the underlying motion papers. The defense argues that it is not their burden to justify redactions and that the government should bear the burden under the Lugosch test. The defense has no objection to redacting personal email addresses of certain individuals.
The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge...
The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order. The court denies Maxwell's request to file certain materials under seal in civil cases, and it adopts the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's letter motion. The document also includes a separate court filing related to a motion to intervene by David A. Golden in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein.
The court has approved the government's proposed redactions to certain documents to protect the iden...
The court has approved the government's proposed redactions to certain documents to protect the identities and privacy interests of victim-witnesses. The court will file unredacted copies under seal. The order was made by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.