Skip to content
Case File
d-1967House OversightLegal Filing

The court has approved the government's proposed redactions to certain documents to protect the iden...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1967
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The court has approved the government's proposed redactions to certain documents to protect the identities and privacy interests of victim-witnesses. The court will file unredacted copies under seal. The order was made by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

Tags

Redactions to court documentsProtection of victim-witnesses' identitiesSealing of unredacted documents
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The defense attorney, Christian R. Everdell, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell d...

The defense attorney, Christian R. Everdell, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell does not seek redactions to the Court's sealed Opinion and Order or the underlying motion papers. The defense argues that it is not their burden to justify redactions and that the government should bear the burden under the Lugosch test. The defense has no objection to redacting personal email addresses of certain individuals.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge...

The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order. The court denies Maxwell's request to file certain materials under seal in civil cases, and it adopts the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's letter motion. The document also includes a separate court filing related to a motion to intervene by David A. Golden in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The Government submits a letter to Judge Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions...

The Government submits a letter to Judge Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement, stating she has extensive access to discovery materials and regular video-teleconference calls with her attorneys. Maxwell is allowed to review discovery 13 hours a day, 7 days a week, and has private VTC calls with her counsel. The letter was filed in response to the Court's Order dated December 8, 2020.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's ...

The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at MDC, detailing her access to discovery materials, communication with attorneys, and search procedures. The letter assures the court that Maxwell has extensive access to discovery materials and regular communication with her attorneys, and that search procedures are in place for institutional safety.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, opposing Ghi...

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's third bail motion. The government argues that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail due to Maxwell's pending appeal and, alternatively, that Maxwell still poses a significant flight risk.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.