Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1278House OversightLegal Filing

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, drawing paral...

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, drawing parallels between Maxwell's case and the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby, arguing that the government reneged on its promise not to prosecute Maxwell, similar to the Cosby case. The letter requests the court to consider this new precedent in deciding on the pending motion to dismiss certain counts of the indictment against Maxwell.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1278
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, drawing parallels between Maxwell's case and the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby, arguing that the government reneged on its promise not to prosecute Maxwell, similar to the Cosby case. The letter requests the court to consider this new precedent in deciding on the pending motion to dismiss certain counts of the indictment against Maxwell.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its implicationsDue Process and fundamental fairness in prosecutionComparison with Commonwealth v. Cosby case
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.