The court rules that David Markus, as appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, is subject to Local C...
Summary
The court rules that David Markus, as appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, is subject to Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and must comply with its provisions regarding extrajudicial statements. The court emphasizes that all lawyers associated with the case must avoid making statements that could interfere with a fair trial or prejudice the due administration of justice.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The US Attorney's office filed a letter with the court alleging that David Markus, appellate counsel...
The US Attorney's office filed a letter with the court alleging that David Markus, appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, violated Local Rule 23.1 by making extrajudicial statements to the media, including an opinion piece in the New York Daily News. The government requests the court to order Markus to comply with the rule to prevent interference with a fair trial.
The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge...
The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order. The court denies Maxwell's request to file certain materials under seal in civil cases, and it adopts the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's letter motion. The document also includes a separate court filing related to a motion to intervene by David A. Golden in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filing: 309
The US Attorney's office filed a letter with the court alleging that David Markus, appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, violated Local Rule 23.1 by making extrajudicial statements to the media, including an opinion piece in the New York Daily News. The government requests the court to order Markus to comply with the rule to prevent interference with a fair trial.
Court Filing: 315
The court rules that David Markus, as appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, is subject to Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and must comply with its provisions regarding extrajudicial statements. The court emphasizes that all lawyers associated with the case must avoid making statements that could interfere with a fair trial or prejudice the due administration of justice.
Court Filing: 51
The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order. The court denies Maxwell's request to file certain materials under seal in civil cases, and it adopts the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's letter motion. The document also includes a separate court filing related to a motion to intervene by David A. Golden in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein.
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys submit a request to the court for her release on bail with proposed co...
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys submit a request to the court for her release on bail with proposed conditions. The document is dated December 4, 2020, and is signed by Mark S. Cohen on behalf of the legal team. It represents Maxwell's formal request for bail.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.