Maxwell Trial - Defense Closing Arguments Transcript
Summary
Transcript of the defense closing arguments in USA v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Laura Menninger argued that Maxwell was being scapegoated for Epstein's crimes, that the victims' memories were unreliable after decades, and that the government had failed to prove Maxwell's direct involvement. The defense emphasized the absence of Epstein as the true perpetrator.
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: 549-1
The court transcript discusses the admissibility of evidence related to the government's investigation, including the thoroughness of the investigation and prior statements. The judge provides guidance on what evidence will be allowed, citing relevant case law and the legal framework for determining admissibility. The defense and prosecution discuss their positions on the matter, with the judge ultimately ruling on certain issues.
Court Transcript: 767
The transcript records a court hearing on December 20, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan, where the prosecution and defense discussed trial logistics, including the redaction of sensitive materials and the timing of closing arguments. The court confirmed that all admitted exhibits had been docketed with tailored redactions and discussed the public availability of visual aids used during closing arguments. The hearing also touched on the timing and duration of the government's and defense's closing arguments.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 103
This reply memorandum supports Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, arguing that the government's case relies heavily on the testimony of three witnesses without significant contemporaneous documentary evidence. Maxwell's defense presents a substantial bail package, including a bond secured by her and her spouse's assets and additional sureties, arguing that these conditions reasonably assure her appearance in court.
Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss: 124
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identify specific dates, accusers, or details of alleged crimes, and thus violates her constitutional rights. They request that Counts One through Four be dismissed or that the court direct the government to provide a Bill of Particulars.
Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion: 134
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government circumvented a protective order in a civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, to obtain evidence used in her criminal prosecution. They request that the court suppress this evidence and dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment due to the government's alleged misconduct.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss: 138
The memorandum of law argues that the pre-indictment delay has prejudiced Ghislaine Maxwell's ability to defend herself, citing lost witnesses, corrupted memories, and tactical delay by the government. The document presents a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the specific circumstances of the case. It contends that the government's delay was reckless and in bad faith, further supporting Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.