Skip to content
Case File
d-1314House OversightOther

The court issues a Protective Order outlining the terms for handling discovery materials in a crimin...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1314
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The court issues a Protective Order outlining the terms for handling discovery materials in a criminal case, including restrictions on disclosure, use, and sharing of confidential information. The order aims to protect the identities of victims and witnesses while allowing the defendant to prepare their defense. The order also establishes procedures for designating and challenging the confidentiality of certain materials.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Handling of discovery materialsConfidentiality and non-disclosureProtection of victim and witness identities
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherUnknown

The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding in...

The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding indictment on the grounds that the grand jury venire did not reflect a fair cross-section of the community. The court denies the motion, rejecting Schulte's claims under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968. The case involves charges related to stealing national defense information and transmitting it to Wikileaks.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order restricts the use, disclosure, and filing of discovery materials provided by the gov...

The court order restricts the use, disclosure, and filing of discovery materials provided by the government to the defendant and their counsel, with specific guidelines for handling confidential information and prohibiting public disclosure of certain details.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order governs the use and disclosure of Discovery materials provided to the Defendant and ...

The court order governs the use and disclosure of Discovery materials provided to the Defendant and their counsel, restricting their use to the defense of the criminal action and outlining who may access these materials.

1p
House OversightOtherUnknown

The court denies the Defendant's third motion for bail, concluding that despite new proposed conditi...

The court denies the Defendant's third motion for bail, concluding that despite new proposed conditions, including renouncing citizenship and asset monitoring, the Defendant still poses a significant risk of flight and that no set of conditions can reasonably assure her appearance in future proceedings.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell

The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court hearing on admissibility of defendant's statement regarding defamation claim

The passage is a routine courtroom exchange about evidentiary motions with no specific names, dates, financial details, or high‑level actors. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming a Defendant's counsel attempted to attribute a statement to the defendant's lawyer and press agent. The court is considering whether the statement shows the defendant's state of mind and ownership of

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.