Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1346House OversightLegal Filing

The letter is from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing against ...

The letter is from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing against the government's proposed language for a protective order, specifically regarding referencing individuals who have publicly identified themselves. Maxwell's defense team asserts that individuals who have publicly spoken about their allegations against Maxwell or Epstein should not be considered to have privacy interests that need protection.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1346
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The letter is from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing against the government's proposed language for a protective order, specifically regarding referencing individuals who have publicly identified themselves. Maxwell's defense team asserts that individuals who have publicly spoken about their allegations against Maxwell or Epstein should not be considered to have privacy interests that need protection.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Protective Order in United States v. Ghislaine MaxwellReferencing Individuals Who Have Publicly Identified ThemselvesPrivacy Interests of Alleged Victims
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.