Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-13745Dept. of JusticeDeposition

deposition: doj-ogr-00010115

The witness, Berke, is questioned about his experience with private investigators and his response to a hypothetical scenario involving a juror lying about their identity. Berke states that he has never encountered a situation where a juror lied about their identity and is unwilling to speculate on what steps he would take in such a scenario. The questioning attorney, Mr. Okula, presses Berke for answers, but Berke maintains that he cannot provide opinions on a hypothetical situation he has never experienced.

Date
Unknown
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
File: doj-ogr-00010115
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The witness, Berke, is questioned about his experience with private investigators and his response to a hypothetical scenario involving a juror lying about their identity. Berke states that he has never encountered a situation where a juror lied about their identity and is unwilling to speculate on what steps he would take in such a scenario. The questioning attorney, Mr. Okula, presses Berke for answers, but Berke maintains that he cannot provide opinions on a hypothetical situation he has never experienced.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: doj-ogr-00010115
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition: A-5822

The document is a deposition transcript where Mr. Schoeman is questioned about his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity and whether more information would have been helpful. He expresses uncertainty about the usefulness of additional information but agrees that sharing a middle initial makes it statistically more likely that two individuals with the same name are the same person.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript Index: A-5670

This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: A-5634

The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE

The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.

4p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE

The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.

3p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003

This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.