Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
Summary
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Saudi charities alleged as instrumentalities of the Kingdom in 9/11 litigation
The passage outlines plaintiffs' claims that several Saudi charities function as arms of the Saudi government and funded 9/11, but the court dismisses the claims on sovereign immunity grounds. While t Plaintiffs name specific charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Rabita Trust, e References to Senate sub‑committee testimony and independent task‑force reports on Saudi terrorist
Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case
The passage discusses routine litigation procedural issues—whether additional anonymous plaintiffs (Jane Doe 3 and 4) should be added and standing under the CVRA. It mentions no high‑profile individua Petitioners argue Jane Doe 3 and 4 need not be listed as parties for the case to proceed. Government claims Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was unknown when the non‑prosecution agreeme Court ha
Court denies addition of new Jane Doe plaintiffs in suit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
The passage reveals a pending civil action that challenges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and mentions additional alleged victims (Jane Doe 3 and 4). While it does not provide new factual Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejected adding these
Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell
The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals
Court denies plaintiffs' attempt to link Saudi princes to al‑Qaida‑funding charities in 9/11 FSIA case
The passage reveals a procedural fight over alleged evidence that Prince Salman and Prince Naif knowingly funded terrorist charities, but the court found the evidence unauthenticated and rejected it. Plaintiffs sought to supplement the record with a 1998 Egyptian article alleging Saudi princes funde The court rejected the submission due to lack of authentication and timing issues. SHC (Saudi Huma
Court Dismisses Terrorism-Related Claims Against Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, Citing Lack of Alleged Material Support Evidence
The passage outlines procedural rulings in a terrorism‑related civil suit involving major Saudi banks, noting the court’s dismissal of claims that the banks provided material support to al‑Qaeda. Whil District court dismissed Burnett ATA claim against Al Rajhi Bank and other ATA claims. Plaintiffs allege that Saudi American Bank knowingly provided material support to Osama bin Laden an Court found
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.