Obscenity Conviction of Harry Reems Cited as Potential Precedent for Political Conspiracy Prosecutions
Summary
The passage discusses legal commentary on the Harry Reems obscenity case and its possible use against political activists, but provides no concrete new evidence, names of officials, financial transact Legal scholars warned the Reems conviction could set a precedent for conspiracy charges against anti Nat Hentoff and Alan Dershowitz publicly criticized the potential expansion of obscenity law. The
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Alan Dershowitz recounts involvement in Harry Reems/Deep Throat legal battles and Harvard student protests
The passage provides personal anecdotes about past First Amendment litigation involving adult film actors and student protests, but offers no concrete new leads, financial transactions, or connections Dershowitz acted as an informal advisor to Harry Reems during his obscenity case. Justice Department eventually dropped the case after public pressure. Harvard students organized a Deep Throat screen
Alan Dershowitz confirms he is still advising Jeffrey Epstein after the 2019 plea deal
The passage provides a concrete lead that a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) continues to give legal advice to Jeffrey Epstein, who was granted a controversial non‑prosecution agreement oversee Dershowitz says Epstein has called him for legal advice post‑plea deal Dershowitz was Epstein’s lawyer during the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement The plea deal was negotiated by Alexander Acosta, late
Court dialogue on obscenity case involving Grove Press and alleged First Amendment misuse
The passage records a courtroom exchange featuring Judge Aldrich, Judge Julian, and attorney Alan Dershowitz discussing obscenity standards and profit motives. It offers no concrete leads, transaction Alan Dershowitz argues the film should be protected by the First Amendment despite alleged obscenity Judges question whether the case is driven by profit rather than free speech. Reference to Grove P
Email from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein sharing Dershowitz commentary on Trump special counsel investigation
The email provides a concrete connection between a known associate (Richard Kahn) and Jeffrey Epstein, referencing a public statement by Alan Dershowitz about ending the Trump special counsel investig Email dated March 30, 2018, sent from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein. Contains a link to a CBS Dallas/Fort Worth article quoting Alan Dershowitz on ending the Trump speci Kahn identifies himself as
Prosecutors’ internal memo reveals aggressive defense tactics and political pressure in Jeffrey Epstein case
The passage details a coordinated defense effort involving high‑profile lawyers (Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr) and attempts to disqualify prosecutors, suggesting possible political influence on the Defense team included Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and other senior legal figures. Prosecutors considered disqualifying two prosecutors after investigating their families. A warning was received t
Allegation that a Trump aide assisted a sex abuser in obtaining a favorable plea deal
The passage mentions a claim that a Trump aide helped a sex abuser secure a lenient plea, but provides no names, dates, or concrete details beyond a vague reference to an AOL article. The lack of spec Reference to an AOL article alleging a Trump aide aided a sex abuser’s plea bargain Mentions a high‑powered lawyer (potentially Alan Dershowitz) but clarifies he is not involved Sender claims victims
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.