Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-14514House OversightOther

Proposal for a New Interdisciplinary Course on Predictive Modeling and Experimentation

The passage is a generic academic proposal without specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations involving powerful actors. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Advocates a course on predictive processes across disciplines Calls for teaching modeling and experimentation methods Mentions various fields (psychology, physics, economics, etc.)

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023909
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a generic academic proposal without specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations involving powerful actors. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Advocates a course on predictive processes across disciplines Calls for teaching modeling and experimentation methods Mentions various fields (psychology, physics, economics, etc.)

Tags

academic-proposaleducationhouse-oversightcurriculum

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Restructuring the University 163 pushing the boundaries of what is known. Wouldn’t this be a bet- ter course than Introduction to Physics? The teachers could introduce whatever aspects of physics they wanted to help students understand the predictive process in that area, but other faculty who did predic- tion in other areas would be part of the discussion. There would be a set of interesting issues ranging from predictions that were thought to be right but weren't, to predictions that are being made today in each area. The content would be the predictive process itself, not the traditional subject matter. Statistics (and other useful tools) would be taught in this context while the predictive process was being studied. Modeling. Who build models? Psychologists think about models of the mind, as do computer scientists and philosophers who specialize in thinking about thinking. Architects and economists build models of a different sort. Engineers work with models regularly. All of these people use different modeling tools but they work on the same thing: trying to figure out how something works by building it and seeing if they can replicate it. They may be using a computer or building blocks or electricity or art. It makes no difference. It is all an attempt to see how things work by building some facsimile. This is an important idea in human thinking, and a course should be taught to undergraduates on how to do it by the people who actually do it, teaching different techniques as they go. They are many ways to build a model, and students in college should know the possibilities before they take on further study. Experimentation. Psychologists do experiments. Chemists do experiments. Physicists do experiments. Medical researchers do experiments. (The drug companies are constantly doing experiments that affect us all.) Why is there no course in learning how to do an experiment? Shouldn't students be learning how to come up with a hypothesis and how to test that hypothesis? Isn’t that more important as a fundamental building block of the mind than any course offered to freshmen in college today? Evaluation. Every academic field does evaluation. In every discipline there are ways and means to discuss and evaluate the worth of papers and research and practical proposals. Businesses are

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.