Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-14713House OversightOther

Potential witness privilege claim linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and undisclosed litigation relationships

The passage hints at a possible protective relationship between a witness and Ghislaine Maxwell, referencing Jeffrey Epstein and a litigation context. While the text is fragmented and lacks concrete d Reference to a witness possibly invoking the Fifth Amendment to protect Ghislaine Maxwell. Mention of a litigation context involving Mr. Cassell and alleged conspiracies. Allusion to a past relations

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011448
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage hints at a possible protective relationship between a witness and Ghislaine Maxwell, referencing Jeffrey Epstein and a litigation context. While the text is fragmented and lacks concrete d Reference to a witness possibly invoking the Fifth Amendment to protect Ghislaine Maxwell. Mention of a litigation context involving Mr. Cassell and alleged conspiracies. Allusion to a past relations

Tags

witness-privilegewitness-testimonypotential-obstructionlitigationfifth-amendmentmaxwelllegal-exposurehouse-oversightepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 145 introduce or (B) adversely inference that are made in 2015 that had nothing to do with any alleged course of or in furtherance of a conspiracy. Any alleged conspiracy would have terminated years ago by operation of many different rules and law. So Mr. Cassell's entire conspiracy theory predicate to this has nothing to do with the four LiButti factors. And when we there is really zero Honor. First of all these individuals -- relationship is, not happen in 2000 or 2001. course of this litigation, talk about the Lil Butti factors, you know, evidence that's been presented to your , the relationship now, in 2017, between because that is what the controlling some relationship that happened or didn't It is the relationship during the not some other litigation. And indeed, there is no relationship between these folks. At best, for a brief period, of time, worked in different capacities for Mr. that brief period of time is more than a brief period of time, these folks Epstein, at best, and ten years ago. The other part of this that Mr. Cassell overlooks or doesn't want to talk about is what really is at issue -- and this relates to this close present relationship -- does this witness have some reason to protect Ms. that's really the inquiry here. Maxwell. I mean, Is the witness invoking her, in this case, privilege against self-incrimination because it's going to have some benefit to Ms. Maxwell? Well, there is no benefit to Ms. Maxwell for the invocation of the Fifth SOUTHI ERN DISTRICT R (212) 805- PORT ERS, P.C. 0300

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01905212

5p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.