Brief argues against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein on sex‑trafficking charges
Summary
The document is a legal argument urging the U.S. Attorney's Office not to pursue federal charges against Epstein. It contains no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence linking powerfu Cites Eleventh Circuit precedent on §1591 requirements for sex‑trafficking of a minor. Claims the government lacks sufficient evidence to prove Epstein's guilt. Argues that federal prosecution would
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Legal memorandum argues insufficient evidence for federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein under §2422(b)
The passage is a legal analysis that critiques the government's case against Epstein, focusing on statutory interpretation and evidentiary standards. It does not provide new factual leads, names of co Claims Epstein took steps to ensure visitors were over 18, challenging the notion of willful blindne Argues federal statutes require proof of a large‑scale ring or interstate targeting of minors, whi
Lawyers seek court order to force reopening of Jeffrey Epstein prosecution under Crime Victims’ Rights Act
The passage highlights a potential legal strategy to compel federal prosecutors to revisit the Epstein case, mentioning specific judges, attorneys, and congressional supporters. While it does not reve Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA). They seek a court order for the government to pay restitution, sanctions, and legal fees to Epstein Law
Court Orders Disclosure of Federal Plea‑Negotiation Emails Between Prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyers
The passage reveals a legal victory that forces the government to produce internal communications about plea negotiations with Jeffrey Epstein, a high‑profile figure. While it does not directly expose Petition filed alleging Epstein committed federal sex crimes against two victims and that the govern District court ruled victims qualify under CVRA and entitled to review plea‑negotiation correspond
Government claims two Jeffrey Epstein victims were complicit, challenging their victim status in 2008 lawsuit
The passage reveals a new government position that two alleged victims were allegedly paid to recruit others for Epstein, which could affect the non‑prosecution agreement and victim‑rights claims. It Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee asserted two plaintiffs were complicit and therefore not victims The claim could undermine the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal ch
Allegations linking Alan Dershowitz, Virginia Roberts, and Jeffrey Epstein to alleged extortion and sexual abuse claims in a court filing
The passage references high‑profile individuals (Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, a former federal judge) and claims of extortion, false accusations, and sexual abuse involving underage girls. While Dershowitz alleges a plot to extort him involving false sexual abuse claims. Virginia Roberts' allegations are tied to a declaration filed on Jan 15, 2015 against the government Reference to attempts
Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.