Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-14843House OversightOther

Alleged permanent emergency declaration and secret security designations linked to 9/11 agenda

The passage mixes historical assertions with personal allegations but provides no verifiable names, dates, or transaction details that can be directly pursued. It mentions high‑level actors (Obama, Bu Claim that a state of emergency declared on September 14, 2001 has been renewed annually by Bush and Allegation that the Posse Comitatus Act has not been repealed despite permanent military involveme

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017592
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage mixes historical assertions with personal allegations but provides no verifiable names, dates, or transaction details that can be directly pursued. It mentions high‑level actors (Obama, Bu Claim that a state of emergency declared on September 14, 2001 has been renewed annually by Bush and Allegation that the Posse Comitatus Act has not been repealed despite permanent military involveme

Tags

government-emergency-powersposse-comitatusmilitary-domestic-deploymenthistorical-security-policyemergency-powerspersonal-security-designationlegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
This used to be illegal... We had the posse comitatus acts which said, yes, if there’s a real emergency you could call up the ARMY to deal with the emergency, but you cannot do it ona permanent basis but we now do do it on a permanent basis. We haven't even bothered to repeal the posse comitatus. We are in a state of emergency that was declared on September the 14th, 2001. And it's still enforced. It has to be renewed every year. Obama did it every year just as George Bush renewed it every year. What are the roots of this? Well there are the legitimate roots that go back to fear of an atomic decapitation of the government back in the Truman era, so legitimate COG planning goes back to Truman and Eisenhower, but the illegitimate use of COG to deal with any emergnecy you like, that goes to the Reagan administration and it really goes back to the [Halloween] Massacre where Rumsfeld and Cheney put their thumbprint on American politics for the first time. -- interview of Peter Dale Scott, @ min. 32:00, https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=hNqDAYWYFuQ&t=2433s This all suggests that the start of the 9/11 agenda pre-dated him as well. | see now that there was a seemingly relevant 1990 event as well. "On September 11, 1970 -- a date that only took on haunting overtones with the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001 -- Nixon became the first U.S. president to try to protect air travelers from extremists who sensed gaping vulnerabilities in security for commercial airliners, issuing a statement listing a string of measures including the introduction of 100 air marshals on U.S. planes. "Most countries, including the United States, found effective means of dealing with piracy on the high seas a century and a half ago,” Nixon said. "We can -- and we will - - deal effectively with piracy in the skies today.” The President had been jolted into action by the simultaneous hijackings of planes in Europe headed to the United States. Jets belonging to TWA, Pan Am and Swissair were seized by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. The group also attempted to hijack a jet over London belonging to the Israeli airline El Al but was thwarted by security guards on board. The Pan Am seizure ended quickly, but the passengers on the TWA and Swissair jets were diverted to a British air base in Jordan and the drama only ended after days of tense diplomacy, when the hostages were all released in a deal in which the Swiss, German, British and Israeli governments let Palestinian prisoners go.” (http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/27/politics/terrorism-19 70s-richard- nixon/index.html) This 9/11 response sounds quite normal of course. But fast forward and the two secret service individuals chosen for an April 2001 interview by a PWC staff member on behalf of what becomthe IBM Center for the Business of Government were (1) Steve Colo who happened to be the head of the division at SAIC that falsely labeled me a threat and added my name to some sort of Do Not Admit list at the end of a 5 month temp assignment in 2005 into early 2006. The consequence of the SAIC designation for me was the following: (| write) "The SAIC designation took advantage of a devilish stratagem in which as a national security employee (having filed out a SF-86 form, governed actually by the GSA - https://Awww.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116390 - for government clearance) working a designated contract in a classified facility, being designated a disturbance/dissident/threat to operations, makes one, in turn, a threat to national security - with all the surveillance/targeting that enables." In essence | was made an enemy of the State and was tracked, my family and friends turned, my opportunities seized to include the opportunity to rear family as demonstrated especially in the 2007 sabotage of my third trimester pregnancy and then the targeting and eventual capture of children | used to babysit - in 2011, they were predominantly tweens - to be used for sexual blackmail and other forms of leverage. The reason for the use of children in this barbaric way was to

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainawww.gsa.gov
Domainyoutube.com
URLhttp://www.cnn.com/2015/07/27/politics/terrorism-19
URLhttps://Awww.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116390

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.