Skip to content
Case File
d-14852House OversightOther

Speculative commentary on former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's unpursued targets

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019848
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage offers only vague speculation about cases Bharara might have avoided, without naming specific individuals, transactions, dates, or concrete evidence. It lacks actionable leads, novel infor Mentions Preet Bharara's departure and potential political ambitions. Alludes to undisclosed 'possible targets' he never pursued. References historical comparison to former U.S. Attorney Morgenthau.

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

political-ambitionus-attorneyspeculationlegal-exposurehouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Allegations of Selective Prosecution and Missed Criminal Charges by SDNY under Preet Bharara after the 2008 Financial Crisis

The passage suggests that senior DOJ officials, including former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara and Attorney General Eric Holder, deliberately limited criminal investigations into the 2008 financial coll Bharara and AG Eric Holder are accused of deprioritizing criminal probes of major banks after the cr Only one mid‑level banker, Kareem Serageldin, was criminally charged despite industry belief that

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

ProPublica article cited in internal email suggests U.S. Attorney Preet Bharata’s leniency toward Wall Street executives after the financial crisis

The passage points to a potential investigative lead that former SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara may have deliberately under‑pursued Wall Street misconduct, contrasting his high‑profile political cor Email from a private individual flags Bharara’s “non‑heroic” handling of Wall Street cases. Reference to ProPublica piece provides a public source that can be cross‑checked. Potential pattern of sele

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

ProPublica article critiques Preet Bharara's Wall Street enforcement record

The passage offers a narrative assessment of Bharara's prosecutorial choices, but provides no concrete new evidence, transactions, or actionable leads. It references known cases and historical context Claims Bharara prioritized insider‑trading cases over systemic Wall Street fraud after the 2008 cris Notes that only a mid‑level banker, Kareem Serageldin, was charged for mortgage‑securities fraud.

4p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former U.S. Attorney Sloman Defends Secret Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Amid Victims' Lawsuit

The passage reveals a federal lawsuit alleging that prosecutors deliberately sealed a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, kept it secret in violation of law, and granted immunity to unname Victims allege prosecutors sealed the Epstein non‑prosecution agreement to prevent them from appeari The lawsuit claims the secrecy violated federal law and that co‑conspirators were granted immunity

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

DOJ Criminal Division memo reviewing potential federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein at request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta

The document shows internal DOJ consideration of whether to prosecute Epstein, referencing U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and a senior DOJ official. It confirms high‑level legal review of a case alrea DOJ Criminal Division conducted an internal review of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation at the reque The memo notes the review was limited in scope and did not examine money‑laundering statutes. Refe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal memo discusses federal prosecution strategy for Jeffrey Epstein and applicability of the petite policy

The document reveals that a U.S. Attorney's Office is evaluating whether to pursue federal charges against Jeffrey Epstein despite state proceedings, indicating potential high‑level prosecutorial deci Memo evaluates federal jurisdiction over commercial sexual exploitation of children in Epstein case. Discusses the 'petite policy' and its inapplicability due to overlapping state charges. Mentions t

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.