Philosophical commentary on consciousness and physics

The passage contains abstract discussion about consciousness and physics with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers no investig Distinguishes empirical observation in physics from subjective consciousness. Claims consciousness cannot be objectively replicated.

Date

November 11, 2025

Source

House Oversight

Reference

House Oversight #032408

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Response "That's because it isn't, and everyone here (apparently save one) is rational and objective enough to understand that. Physical phenomena, and phenomena in general, are ultimately perceptual in nature and subject to observational replication - that's why they call physics an empirical science. But consciousness is not. Consciousness cannot be objectively, replicably observed. Its putative physical correlates, including

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.

Philosophical commentary on consciousness and physics

Summary

Tags

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

Forum Discussions