Skip to content
Case File
d-14948House OversightOther

Self‑authored account of alleged criminal defamation case in Italy over criticism of a federal judge

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017237
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage is a personal narrative describing a defamation claim filed by an Italian prosecutor against the author for comments about a judge. It contains no concrete evidence, financial transactions Author claims to have been criminally charged in Turin for statements made from Cambridge. Charges allegedly stem from criticism of a federal judge’s opinion on terrorism suspects. No specific names,

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

free-speechitalydefamationfree-speech-controversyjudicial-criticismlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-proceedings
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Subject dismisses O'Brien's allegations and defends past Army PSYOP work

The passage offers vague denials and general statements without specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions a book with broad accusations but provides no concrete leads to Author claims O'Brien's book contains unverified sex accusations against many officials. No libel suits filed, implying the author considers the claims fringe. Denial of involvement in MK‑Ultra, stat

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former DePaul faculty member alleges involvement in tenure review of controversial professor

The passage details personal grievances and academic disputes with no concrete evidence of wrongdoing by high‑level officials, financial transactions, or foreign influence. It lacks actionable leads, Author claims to have been asked by a former department chair to expose alleged dishonesty. Accusations of harassment and extremist language directed at the author. Reference to a cartoon controversy

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

College rape allegation involving a small‑stature violinist and subsequent court reversal

The passage recounts a single campus sexual assault case with no indication of high‑level officials, financial transactions, or broader systemic misconduct. It provides limited specifics (names of par Itzhak Perlman allegedly contacted the author about the case. Accusation involved a 99‑lb violinist and a 140‑lb lacrosse player. Defendant was convicted, sentenced to 95 days, then conviction was re

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement

The passage describes a campus free‑speech case and the author's personal involvement, but it lacks concrete leads on financial flows, wrongdoing by powerful officials, or novel allegations. No high‑r Students (referred to as the "Irvine Ten") were convicted for censoring a speaker. The author was asked to testify as an expert but declined. The author defends the prosecutor’s decision as protectin

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Magazine publishes defamatory attack on President Johnson

The passage merely describes a sensational magazine issue attacking President Johnson with no specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable evidence. It offers no concrete leads for investigation A May‑edition magazine allegedly contains false, profane accusations against President Johnson. The magazine is distributed as second‑class mail and reportedly selling well at newsstands. The author

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged extremist cartoon commissioned by Norman Finkelstein depicting a public figure in violent parody

The passage mentions a controversial cartoon allegedly commissioned by activist Norman Finkelstein and created by a South American neo‑Nazi, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, Claims a cartoon was commissioned by Norman Finkelstein calling for the author's assassination. Describes the cartoon as a South American neo‑Nazi illustration depicting the author watching Israel Fr

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.