Skip to content
Case File
d-36269House OversightOther

Alleged extremist cartoon commissioned by Norman Finkelstein depicting a public figure in violent parody

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017239
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage mentions a controversial cartoon allegedly commissioned by activist Norman Finkelstein and created by a South American neo‑Nazi, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, Claims a cartoon was commissioned by Norman Finkelstein calling for the author's assassination. Describes the cartoon as a South American neo‑Nazi illustration depicting the author watching Israel Fr

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

first-amendmentextremist-propagandaprivacyforeign-influencedefamationmedia-lawlegal-exposureextremist-contenthouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Subject dismisses O'Brien's allegations and defends past Army PSYOP work

The passage offers vague denials and general statements without specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions a book with broad accusations but provides no concrete leads to Author claims O'Brien's book contains unverified sex accusations against many officials. No libel suits filed, implying the author considers the claims fringe. Denial of involvement in MK‑Ultra, stat

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Self‑authored account of alleged criminal defamation case in Italy over criticism of a federal judge

The passage is a personal narrative describing a defamation claim filed by an Italian prosecutor against the author for comments about a judge. It contains no concrete evidence, financial transactions Author claims to have been criminally charged in Turin for statements made from Cambridge. Charges allegedly stem from criticism of a federal judge’s opinion on terrorism suspects. No specific names,

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Allegations of Framed Accusations Involving Virginia Roberts, Bill Clinton, Al and Tipper Gore, and Leslie Wexner

The passage provides specific names of high‑profile individuals (Bill Clinton, Al and Tipper Gore, Leslie Wexner, Alan Dershowitz) and claims of sealed evidence (emails, manuscript, legal brief) that Roberts allegedly claimed to have met Bill Clinton, Al and Tipper Gore on Jeffrey Epstein’s island – Roberts is accused of fabricating allegations against the author for financial reasons, with alleg

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged Israeli Military Intelligence Knowledge of Phalangist Involvement in Sabra and Shatila Massacre

The passage provides a first‑person recollection that Israeli intelligence officers were aware that Phalangist militia had entered the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps and that attempts were made to ha Claims that Israeli military intelligence heard rumors of Phalangist entry into the camps. Attempts by the author to contact senior officers (Arik, Oded Shamir) to halt the operation. Reference to se

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney recounts involvement in Pentagon Papers litigation and Supreme Court arguments

The passage provides a personal recollection of historic legal work related to the Pentagon Papers, mentioning well‑known figures (Senator Mike Gravel, Justice Potter Stewart, Alexander Bickel, Solici The author represented Beacon Press and Senator Gravel in Pentagon Papers cases that reached the Sup Mentions a hypothetical discussion between Justice Stewart and constitutional scholar Alexander Bi

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement

The passage describes a campus free‑speech case and the author's personal involvement, but it lacks concrete leads on financial flows, wrongdoing by powerful officials, or novel allegations. No high‑r Students (referred to as the "Irvine Ten") were convicted for censoring a speaker. The author was asked to testify as an expert but declined. The author defends the prosecutor’s decision as protectin

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.