Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement
Summary
The passage describes a campus free‑speech case and the author's personal involvement, but it lacks concrete leads on financial flows, wrongdoing by powerful officials, or novel allegations. No high‑r Students (referred to as the "Irvine Ten") were convicted for censoring a speaker. The author was asked to testify as an expert but declined. The author defends the prosecutor’s decision as protectin
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Self‑authored account of alleged criminal defamation case in Italy over criticism of a federal judge
The passage is a personal narrative describing a defamation claim filed by an Italian prosecutor against the author for comments about a judge. It contains no concrete evidence, financial transactions Author claims to have been criminally charged in Turin for statements made from Cambridge. Charges allegedly stem from criticism of a federal judge’s opinion on terrorism suspects. No specific names,
Attorney recounts involvement in Pentagon Papers litigation and Supreme Court arguments
The passage provides a personal recollection of historic legal work related to the Pentagon Papers, mentioning well‑known figures (Senator Mike Gravel, Justice Potter Stewart, Alexander Bickel, Solici The author represented Beacon Press and Senator Gravel in Pentagon Papers cases that reached the Sup Mentions a hypothetical discussion between Justice Stewart and constitutional scholar Alexander Bi
Former DePaul faculty member alleges involvement in tenure review of controversial professor
The passage details personal grievances and academic disputes with no concrete evidence of wrongdoing by high‑level officials, financial transactions, or foreign influence. It lacks actionable leads, Author claims to have been asked by a former department chair to expose alleged dishonesty. Accusations of harassment and extremist language directed at the author. Reference to a cartoon controversy
Critique of First Amendment Analogy Using Abbie Hoffman Case
The passage discusses legal theory and historical analogies without revealing new facts, specific transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile individuals or agencies. It mentions a past c The author argues against using the "shouting fire in a crowded theater" analogy for speech restrict References a 1989 article criticizing the Holmes analogy. Mentions personal involvement in Abbie H
Personal account of campus protests and police interaction
The passage is a subjective narrative describing the author's experiences with protestors and police at a public event. It contains no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations li Author claims police instructed them not to engage protestors and escorted them away. Mentions multiple international locations where the author faced hostility when speaking about Israe References a
Alleged extremist cartoon commissioned by Norman Finkelstein depicting a public figure in violent parody
The passage mentions a controversial cartoon allegedly commissioned by activist Norman Finkelstein and created by a South American neo‑Nazi, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, Claims a cartoon was commissioned by Norman Finkelstein calling for the author's assassination. Describes the cartoon as a South American neo‑Nazi illustration depicting the author watching Israel Fr
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.