Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15020House OversightOther

Email advising Ghislaine Maxwell to deny Prince Andrew allegations after Daily Mail story

The passage contains a private email urging Ghislaine Maxwell to issue a denial regarding Prince Andrew's alleged involvement in a 'Hookers and Pimps' party. It mentions no concrete transactions, date Email dated Jan 9 2015 references Daily Mail article linking Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and H Sender Philip Barden advises Maxwell to issue a public denial to mitigate reputational damage. The

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030600
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a private email urging Ghislaine Maxwell to issue a denial regarding Prince Andrew's alleged involvement in a 'Hookers and Pimps' party. It mentions no concrete transactions, date Email dated Jan 9 2015 references Daily Mail article linking Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and H Sender Philip Barden advises Maxwell to issue a public denial to mitigate reputational damage. The

Tags

prince-andrewreputational-riskmedia-influencemedia-scandalghislaine-maxwellemail-correspondenceheidi-klumhouse-oversightlegal-disclaimer

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: [email protected] To: G Maxwell [email protected]; Subject: Re: FW: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702] Sent: 1/9/2015 2:52:36 PM Ok , tie it to the easily disproved Clinton On Friday, January 9, 2015, G Maxwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I am going o have to make a statement – I will send it to you – I don’t have a choice THE TERRAMAR PROJECT <http://theterramarproject.org/> FACEBOOK <https://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject> TWITTER <http://twitter.com/terramarproject> G+ <https://plus.google.com/104195649525707945586/posts> PINTEREST <http://pinterest.com/terramarproject/> INSTAGRAM <http://instagram.com/theterramarproject> PLEDGE <http://www.theterramarproject.org/pledge> THE DAILY CATCH <http://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch/> From: Philip Barden Date: Friday, January 9, 2015 at 5:09 AM To: gmax, Ross Gow Subject: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with Ghislaine Maxwell | Daily Mail Online [IWOV-Matters.FID782702] Dear Ghislaine Below is a link to today's Mail. The allegations are getting worse - this is not a storm you can ride by not making any statement out and get your life back. You have friends saying they don't believe you would act in this way and you need to say that you did not. The Mail website is read by 193 million I don't see how a statement denying the allegations will make matters worse which is the acid test. It will make your position better as you will a strong open denial on record. These allegations must not gain traction. I wont say anymore as I have given my advice - call me. Best Philip http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2900787/Prince-Andrew-Heidi-Klum-Hookers-Pimps-party-New-York-socialite-accused-procuring-underage-girls-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html ________________________________ This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have read this email and it is not addressed to you, please notify [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors and registration number 0049857. This Firm does not accept service by electronic mail or facsimile. A list of partners, together with further legal statements, is available upon request or at www.devonshires.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/legal-notices.html <http://www.devonshires.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/legal-notices.html> Devonshires Solicitors, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)20 7256 7318 Where instructions have been given by Devonshires Solicitors to a barrister to work on a client’s matter, we notify you, on behalf of that barrister, that you have the right to make a complaint about the service provided by that barrister or about the conduct of their Chambers. A copy of the barrister and / or their Chambers’ complaints procedure may be obtained by contacting the Senior Clerk of that Chambers, whose contact details can be found online, or from us. Complaints may be made direct to the barrister / their Chambers. Please note that there may be a time limit for bringing your complaint. You may also have the right to ask the Legal Ombudsman to consider your complaint at the end of the complaints process. Information on complaints to the Legal Ombudsman, including the details of strict time limits to bring a complaint, may be found at http://www.legalombudsman.org.uk. The Devonshires Foundation is proud to support Action for Kids (reg. charity 1068841), Wide horizons (reg. charity 1105847), and Theatre Royal Stratford East (reg. charity 233801) during 2013/2014. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -- please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Technical Artifacts (18)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone+44 (0)20 7256 7318
Phone+44 (0)20 7628 7576
Phone2900787
Phone5707945586
URLhttp://instagram.com/theterramarproject
URLhttp://pinterest.com/terramarproject
URLhttp://theterramarproject.org
URLhttp://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch
URLhttp://twitter.com/terramarproject
URLhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2900787/Prince-Andrew-Heidi-Klum-Hookers-Pimps-party-New-York-socialite-accused-procuring-underage-girls-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html
URLhttp://www.devonshires.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/legal-notices.html
URLhttp://www.legalombudsman.org.uk
URLhttp://www.theterramarproject.org/pledge
URLhttps://plus.google.com/104195649525707945586/posts
URLhttps://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal emails discuss handling of alleged abuse claims involving Jeffrey Epstein, G. Maxwell, and advice from Alan Dershowitz

The correspondence reveals coordinated attempts to manage public statements about alleged abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein, mentions high‑profile legal counsel (Alan Dershowitz) and suggests potential Emails dated Jan 10‑11 2015 reference “JE” (Jeffrey Epstein) and direct abuse allegations against an Philip Barden urges G Maxwell to issue a denial and to consult Epstein’s lawyer, indicating possib

3p
House OversightUnknown

Internal emails discuss handling of alleged abuse claims involving Jeffrey Epstein, G. Maxwell, and advice from Alan Dershowitz

Internal emails discuss handling of alleged abuse claims involving Jeffrey Epstein, G. Maxwell, and advice from Alan Dershowitz The correspondence reveals coordinated attempts to manage public statements about alleged abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein, mentions high‑profile legal counsel (Alan Dershowitz) and suggests potential litigation risk for G Maxwell. It provides concrete names, dates (Jan 2015) and a clear line of communication that could be followed up for documents, lawyer contacts, and any undisclosed settlements, making it a useful investigative lead, though the specifics are vague and the claims unverified. Key insights: Emails dated Jan 10‑11 2015 reference “JE” (Jeffrey Epstein) and direct abuse allegations against an unnamed party.; Philip Barden urges G Maxwell to issue a denial and to consult Epstein’s lawyer, indicating possible coordination with Epstein’s legal team.; Reference to Alan Dershowitz as a “big piece” in The Times, suggesting media strategy involving a prominent attorney.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court Transcript Reveals Potential Undisclosed Evidence and High‑Profile Connections in Giuffre v. Maxwell Defamation Case

The transcript contains several concrete references that could be pursued for investigative value: attempts to depose former President Bill Clinton; FOIA requests and alleged FBI involvement (Louie Fr Plaintiff’s counsel sought to depose Bill Clinton to establish his relationship with Epstein. Reference to former FBI Director Louis Freeh as an expert witness without a Rule 26 disclosure. Discussio

138p
House OversightJan 9, 2015

Email advising Ghislaine Maxwell to deny Prince Andrew allegations after Daily Mail story

Email advising Ghislaine Maxwell to deny Prince Andrew allegations after Daily Mail story The passage contains a private email urging Ghislaine Maxwell to issue a denial regarding Prince Andrew's alleged involvement in a 'Hookers and Pimps' party. It mentions no concrete transactions, dates beyond the email timestamp, or new evidence. The lead is low‑value because it merely reflects standard crisis‑management advice and does not provide actionable leads on financial flows, legal exposure, or foreign influence. Key insights: Email dated Jan 9 2015 references Daily Mail article linking Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Heidi Klum.; Sender Philip Barden advises Maxwell to issue a public denial to mitigate reputational damage.; The email includes links to the TerraMar Project social media, but no direct connection to the alleged misconduct.

1p
House OversightMay 25, 2017

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.