Skip to content
Case File
d-1519House OversightDeposition

The court denies the defendant's motion for a mistrial and addresses issues related to witness testi...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1519
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The court denies the defendant's motion for a mistrial and addresses issues related to witness testimony and identity protection. The court instructs the jury on the use of first names for certain individuals and directs the parties to provide witnesses with a list of protected identities. The government and defense discuss and object to certain instructions.

Tags

Motion for MistrialWitness Testimony and Identity ProtectionJury Instructions
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightCorrespondenceUnknown

Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team requests the court's permission to modify the Protective Order to all...

Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team requests the court's permission to modify the Protective Order to allow the use of certain discovery materials in other related matters, and to file some materials under seal. The request is made pursuant to paragraph 18 of the court's Protective Order. The defendant seeks to disclose discovery materials produced by the government to judicial officers in other cases.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...

The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her fo...

The document is a court filing in a criminal case where the defendant is offering to renounce her foreign citizenship as part of her bail package. The government argues that this offer does not mitigate the risk of flight and is of unclear validity. The court is being asked to consider whether the defendant's offer is sufficient to alter its prior bail determinations.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed un...

The court has received twelve pre-trial motions from the defendant, some of which have been filed under temporary seal due to sensitive information. The government is given two days to respond to the proposed redactions. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions an...

The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions and some additional ones suggested by the government to protect sensitive information and third-party privacy. The court applies the Lugosch test to justify the redactions, and orders the defendant to file the redacted documents by February 5, 2021.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.