Attorneys Seek to Void Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement, Claim DOJ Concealed Victim Rights
Summary
The passage alleges that the U.S. Attorney’s Office deliberately kept Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement secret to avoid criticism, and that Epstein used high‑level political and social connections t Motion filed to void Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement on grounds of violating the Crime Victim Ri Attorneys cite redacted, sealed emails/letters from the U.S. Attorney’s Office acknowledging duty
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Debate Over Whether Jeffrey Epstein’s Federal Non‑Prosecution Deal Violated Victims’ Rights
The passage reveals that U.S. attorneys concealed a federal non‑prosecution agreement from alleged victims and possibly violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, suggesting a potential prosecutorial mis Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein kept secret from victims in 2008. U.S. attorneys sent letters to victims describing an ongoing federal investigation despite the agree Assistant U.S. At
Jeffrey Epstein’s secret 2008 non‑prosecution deal with U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta raises questions of political influence and possible misconduct
The passage identifies a concrete plea‑deal negotiated by former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labor Secretary) that shielded Epstein from federal trafficking charges. It names specific actors ( Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in Miami in 2008, approved a secret non‑prosecution deal for Epstein. Acosta is now Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, creating a potential conflict of inter Vic
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Miami Herald article cites Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein
The passage identifies a concrete legal maneuver— a non‑prosecution agreement signed by a sitting U.S. Attorney that effectively shelved a federal indictment— linking a high‑ranking official (Acosta) FBI prepared a 53‑page federal indictment against Epstein in 2007. Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non‑prosecution agreement that sealed the indictment. Epstein received a reduced state
Calls to Unseal Epstein‑Maxwell Documents Highlight DOJ Non‑Prosecution Deal and Potential Links to Powerful Figures
The passage outlines concrete legal actions (appeals deadline, motions, judge orders) and identifies specific actors—Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labo Second Circuit appeals panel set a March 29 deadline for additional pleadings on unsealing Maxwell‑r U.S. Attorney Byung Pak’s recent filing argues victims have no legal right to demand disclosure, p
Judge Seals Federal Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, Limiting Disclosure to Victims
The passage reveals that a federal non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein remains sealed, with limited access granted only to victims and their counsel. This provides a concrete lead—obt Federal NPA with Epstein was negotiated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and remains sealed. Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee argued the agreement was never filed under seal in federal court. Judge Ke
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.