Calls to Unseal Epstein‑Maxwell Documents Highlight DOJ Non‑Prosecution Deal and Potential Links to Powerful Figures
Summary
The passage outlines concrete legal actions (appeals deadline, motions, judge orders) and identifies specific actors—Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labo Second Circuit appeals panel set a March 29 deadline for additional pleadings on unsealing Maxwell‑r U.S. Attorney Byung Pak’s recent filing argues victims have no legal right to demand disclosure, p
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Push to Unseal Epstein‑Maxwell Court Records Highlights Potential DOJ Non‑Prosecution Deal and Links to High‑Profile Figures
The passage references an ongoing appellate effort to force the Justice Department to release sealed documents in the Jeffrey Epstein‑Ghislaine Maxwell defamation case. It mentions specific actors (At Appeals panel in New York ordered parties to file additional pleadings by March 29, indicating activ U.S. Attorney Byung Pak responded to a request to unseal records, hinting at DOJ resistance to dis
Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Involving U.S. Attorney’s Office and Potential Political Pressure
The passage details a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that was allegedly influenced by pressure on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, referencing former Attorney General Ale Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta acknowledged a "year‑long assault" on the prosecution by Eps
Victims allege U.S. Attorney’s Office kept Epstein non‑prosecution agreement secret and Ghislaine Maxwell was subpoenaed over alleged recruitment o...
The passage reveals a confidential non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) between the Justice Department and Jeffrey Epstein that was hidden from victims, suggesting possible misconduct by federal prosecutor U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein entered a confidential NPA that barred victims from learning abou Victims filed a Crime Victims’ Rights Act petition alleging denial of statutory rights. Virginia G
Jeffrey Epstein’s secret 2008 non‑prosecution deal with U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta raises questions of political influence and possible misconduct
The passage identifies a concrete plea‑deal negotiated by former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta (now Labor Secretary) that shielded Epstein from federal trafficking charges. It names specific actors ( Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in Miami in 2008, approved a secret non‑prosecution deal for Epstein. Acosta is now Secretary of Labor in the Trump administration, creating a potential conflict of inter Vic
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Deal Between U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein Shielded Powerful Figures
The passage describes a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to serve only 13 months and granted immunity to unnamed co‑conspirators, potentially including high‑level politica Acosta, as U.S. Attorney, negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Epstein in 2007‑2008. The NPA granted immunity to unnamed “potential co‑conspirators,” hinting at other powerful individua E
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.