Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15311House OversightOther

Bank of America panel discusses big data adoption and financial regulation trends

The document contains only survey results and a summary of a conference panel with senior lawyers and a bank executive discussing regulatory tone and big‑data adoption. It provides no concrete allegat Survey shows ~60% of financial institutions are fully committed to using big data for cost, revenue, After discussion, 55% say institutions are more committed to allocating resources to big data. Pan

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014372
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document contains only survey results and a summary of a conference panel with senior lawyers and a bank executive discussing regulatory tone and big‑data adoption. It provides no concrete allegat Survey shows ~60% of financial institutions are fully committed to using big data for cost, revenue, After discussion, 55% say institutions are more committed to allocating resources to big data. Pan

Tags

mafinancial-institutionsregulationconferencebig-datahouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Chart 84: Now that we've defined “big data”, how far do you think financial institutions are at embracing the use of big data today? 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Fully committed to Fully committed to Fully committed to © Somewhat Not at all using big datato using bigdatato using big data committed committed generate improve cost or across the investment alpha / process efficiency, organization revenue growth risk management, regulatory compliance Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research Chart 85: After this conversation, have you changed your mind on how financial institutions are adopting big data in their businesses? 60% 55% 50% 40% 30% 23% 23% 20% 10% 0% Financial institutions are more Financial institutions are less No change committed to allocating committed to allocating resources to bigdata than! — resources to big data than | thought thought Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research The Future of Financials M&A and Regulation We hosted a panel to discuss the state and outlook of M&A and regulation. Given the results of the US election and the potential for easing of regulations, the panel discussed a timely topic on the mind of investors. Our panelists included Rodgin Cohen, Senior Chairman of Sullivan & Cromwell; Richard Kim, partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, and Ed Hill, Senior Vice President, Government Affairs, Bank of America Corporation. = Regulation is about tone: Our panelists agreed that the scope and strength of regulation comes from the tone and attitude of regulators rather than from legislation. They noted that an attempt to repeal legislation such as Dodd-Frank would be misplaced as most direction derives from the tops of regulatory bodies. They also felt Senator Hensarling’s Financial Choice Act would not be a better alternative to Dodd-Frank given the 10% leverage ratio is not a Federal Reserve definition of leverage. Utilizing a Fed definition would likely lead to leverage north of 10%. The inclusion of CAMEL ratings with the leverage ratio would also allow regulatory sway over institutions. 58 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Bankof America 2 Merrill Lynch

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.