Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15909House OversightOther

DOJ officials discuss delaying victim notification in Epstein-related civil remedy

The passage reveals internal deliberations about notifying alleged victims in a civil remedy tied to an Epstein case, mentioning Judge Starr and Assistant Attorney General Fisher. While it hints at pr Officials object to sending letters to alleged victims before Epstein enters a plea. Request for review and objection rights over any victim notification letters. Judge Starr has scheduled a meeting

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012677
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals internal deliberations about notifying alleged victims in a civil remedy tied to an Epstein case, mentioning Judge Starr and Assistant Attorney General Fisher. While it hints at pr Officials object to sending letters to alleged victims before Epstein enters a plea. Request for review and objection rights over any victim notification letters. Judge Starr has scheduled a meeting

Tags

civil-remedyjudicial-oversightvictim-notificationprocedural-manipulationdoj-internal-memolegal-exposurehouse-oversightepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
AE AOE UAYAL AMMO) 2RO YUU RU TY, WO MEU UL WU PLU LUN @ LOL U LULU LU LUN age victims in this matter; however that option was rejected by your Office. Had that option been chosen, we would not object to your notifying the alleged victims at this point. At this juncture, however, we do not accept your contention that there is a requirement that the government notify the alleged victims of a potential civil remedy in this case. Accordingly, for all the reasons we have stated above, we respectfully -- and firmly -- object to your sending any letter whatsoever to the alleged victims in this matter. Furthermore, if a letter is to be sent to these individuals, we believe we should have a right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged victims. We also request that if your Office believes that it must send a letter to go to the alleged victims, who still have not been identified to us, it should happen only after Mr. Epstein has entered his plea. This letter should then come from the attorney representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias. As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as early as next week. Accordingly, we respectfully request that we postpone our discussion of sending a letter to the alleged victims until after that meeting. We strongly believe that rushing to send any letter out this week is not the wisest manner in which to proceed. Given that Mr. Epstein will not even enter his plea for another few weeks, time is clearly not of the essence regarding any notification to the identified individuals. Thanks very much, Jay “Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" To “Jay Lefkowitz" . 11/27/2007 01:55 PM ce "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" Po Subject Epstein Jay, Please accept my apologies for not getting back to you sooner but I was a little under the weather yesterday. I hope that you enjoyed your Thanksgiving. Regarding the issue of due diligence concerning Judge Davis’ selection, I’d like to make a few observations. First, Guy Lewis has known for some time that Judge Davis was making reasonable efforts to secure Aaron Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg for this assignment. In fact, when I told you of Judge Davis’s selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°,

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57

57p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.& 4 Siren Mann. FL 53132 • Telephone • Facsimile I write in response to your November 28'" letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily on that issue as well. I do wish to make some more general observations, however. Section 2255 provides that "[a]ny person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of [enumerated sections of Title 18) and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation . . . may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana. Ann Marie C (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday. November 28. 2007 5:27 PM To: Lourie, Andrew: Oosterbaan, Andrew Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein Attachments: Signed Plea Agreement.pdf; Final Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. A. Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Original Message From: Lourie, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:02 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Original Message From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) < To: Lourie, Andrew; Oosterbaan, Andrew Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 S

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

09/24/2007

09/24/2007 01:27 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" <[email protected]> cc 'Martin Weinberg' <owlm otidnet. . bee Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney Hi Jay — Sorry for the delay. The U.S. Attorney had a last-minute concern, that I think I fixed (it is in the first "It Appearing" clause following the list of statutes potentially violated). After you get the green light, let's discuss the potential representative. The person I am thinking of has run a preliminary conflicts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted to tell you that I have compiled a list of 34 confirmed minors. There are six others, whose names we already have, who need to be interviewed by the FBI to confirm whether they were 17 or 18 at the time of their activity with Mr. Epstein. Once those interviews are completed, I can finalize the list of identified victims, which I will put in a formal document that I will mainta

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Dear Mr. Starr:

Dear Mr. Starr: I write in response to your November 2811' letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily to that issues as well. I do wish to make some more general observations, however. Section 2255 provides that "any minor who is a victim of a violation of [enumerated sections of Title 18] and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee." Thus, had this Office proceeded to trial, and had Mr. Epstein been convicted, the victims of his actions would have been entitled to relief under this Section. The Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into between the Southern District of Fl

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.