Jeffrey Epstein’s plea deal allegedly shielded by federal prosecutors, including Labor Secretary Acosta’s office
Summary
The passage links a high‑ranking Trump administration official (Secretary of Labor Marty Acosta) to the federal handling of Epstein’s case and cites a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to conceal the plea Marty Acosta, now Labor Secretary, testified he was unaware of Epstein’s lenient treatment, yet pros Court records show federal prosecutors acquiesced to Epstein’s demand to avoid prison. Victim Cour
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Epstein defense team seeks to keep plea‑deal correspondence private, alleging prosecutor investigation and non‑prosecution agreement controversy
The passage reveals a potential lead that defense attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein attempted to shield communications about a non‑prosecution agreement and allegedly hired private investigators to dig in Defense attorneys (Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Martin G. Weinberg) filed a motion to block disclosure Alex Acosta’s letter alleges the defense tried to hire private investigators to dig up personal in
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Attorneys Seek to Void Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement, Claim DOJ Concealed Victim Rights
The passage alleges that the U.S. Attorney’s Office deliberately kept Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement secret to avoid criticism, and that Epstein used high‑level political and social connections t Motion filed to void Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement on grounds of violating the Crime Victim Ri Attorneys cite redacted, sealed emails/letters from the U.S. Attorney’s Office acknowledging duty
Internal email chain discussing framing Jeffrey Epstein's case and potential political leverage against the Trump administration
The passage reveals a coordinated effort by senior legal and political operatives (including references to Ken Starr, Alex Acosta, and possible Clinton connections) to shape the narrative around Jeffr Email dated Dec 15, 2018 references using Epstein's "Clinton connection" to attack the Trump adminis Ken Starr is shown drafting a defense of the federal handling of Epstein's case, mentioning Alex A
Email chain linking Steve Bannon and a source to Alex Acosta's handling of Jeffrey Epstein case
The passage cites a forwarded email from an unnamed source (Robert Grusky) to Steve Bannon discussing Acosta's alleged lenient plea deal for Epstein and a civil lawsuit buyout. It identifies high‑prof Steve Bannon received an email about Acosta’s role in Epstein’s plea bargain. Claims that Epstein bought out a civil suit that would have allowed victims to testify. Allegation that Acosta’s lenient
Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe into Former Attorney Alexander Acosta
The passage identifies concrete actions—recusal of Miami prosecutors, reassignment to the Atlanta U.S. Attorney (Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appointee), and an ongoing DOJ Office of Professional Resp Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump‑ J
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.