Skip to content
Case File
d-1612House OversightLegal Filing

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address bo...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1612
Pages
1
Persons
5

Summary

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address book allegedly belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, is not authentic and should not be admitted as evidence without proper authentication. The defense contends that the book was altered by Alfredo Rodriguez, a former Epstein employee, and that the government's witness cannot verify its authenticity.

Tags

Authentication of Government Exhibit 52Admissibility of EvidenceTrial Procedure
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 490

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address book allegedly belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, is not authentic and should not be admitted as evidence without proper authentication. The defense contends that the book was altered by Alfredo Rodriguez, a former Epstein employee, and that the government's witness cannot verify its authenticity.

3p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This document is an exhibit filed in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, listing the defense's reque...

This document is an exhibit filed in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, listing the defense's requests for documents related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement negotiations between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as communications between government agencies and attorneys for accusing witnesses. The requests cover a range of topics, including meetings between SDNY prosecutors and attorneys for accusing witnesses in 2016 and 2018.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detenti...

The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detention period extends, and that the government's assessment of her flight risk has increased in tandem with the diminishing strength of their case. It highlights the defendant's challenges to the indictment, including the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and statute of limitations issues. The document also alleges that government prosecutors misled a federal judge to obtain evidence against Maxwell.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a government memorandum in support of detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that ...

The document is a government memorandum in support of detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that she poses an extreme risk of flight due to the serious charges against her, her international ties, and her lack of meaningful connections to the United States. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, stemming from her alleged involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in a scheme to abuse young girls. The government contends that Maxwell's wealth, multiple passports, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence create a strong incentive for her to flee.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing by the US Government requesting an extension of the discovery product...

The document is a court filing by the US Government requesting an extension of the discovery production deadline in the Ghislaine Maxwell case due to delays in processing data from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The Government has produced over 350,000 pages of discovery and expects to make additional productions. A separate letter from a victim of Jeffrey Epstein expresses frustration and concern over the handling of the 'Epstein Files' and the lack of transparency.

1p
House OversightCorrespondenceUnknown

The document is a government memorandum responding to court orders regarding the disclosure of grand...

The document is a government memorandum responding to court orders regarding the disclosure of grand jury transcripts in the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It discusses the factors set forth in In re Craig for determining whether to disclose grand jury materials and addresses the government's position on the matter. The government is seeking to unseal certain grand jury transcripts while also requesting to file a supplemental submission to protect victims' interests.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.