Skip to content
Case File
d-1614House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that M...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1614
Pages
1
Persons
5

Summary

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that Minor Victim-3's testimony is admissible as direct evidence or under Rule 404(b) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government claims that Minor Victim-3's testimony will help establish Maxwell's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and her involvement in the alleged conspiracies.

Tags

Admissibility of Minor Victim-3's testimonyRelevance of evidence under Rule 404(b)Ghislaine Maxwell's alleged involvement in sex crimes conspiracies
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 492

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that Minor Victim-3's testimony is admissible as direct evidence or under Rule 404(b) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government claims that Minor Victim-3's testimony will help establish Maxwell's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and her involvement in the alleged conspiracies.

13p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding t...

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to the court's footnote regarding the disclosure of Ghislaine Maxwell's co-conspirators. The government objects to providing an exhaustive list of co-conspirators and intends to introduce statements from only two individuals, Jeffrey Epstein and an employee of Epstein's, at trial.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge...

The document is a court filing that includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order from U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify a protective order. The court denies Maxwell's request to file certain materials under seal in civil cases, and it adopts the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's letter motion. The document also includes a separate court filing related to a motion to intervene by David A. Golden in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The documents include a transcript of a court hearing in the United States v. Jeffrey Epstein case a...

The documents include a transcript of a court hearing in the United States v. Jeffrey Epstein case and a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to a request to modify a protective order. The hearing transcript discusses the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Epstein due to his death, while the letter argues against the government's proposed redactions and sealing of certain documents.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that t...

The document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that the government should be required to disclose certain materials related to alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse, as they are exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland and material to preparing the defense under Rule 16.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for th...

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.