Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1616House Oversight

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence o...

Legal Filing

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence of the sex trafficking conspiracy charged in Count Five and should be excluded under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The government had argued that Accuser-3's evidence is admissible to prove the sex trafficking conspiracy, but the defense counters that the government's arguments are meritless and based on flawed assumptions.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1616
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.