This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude ex...
Summary
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghisla...
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.
Court Filing: 41114
The government moved for reconsideration of the court's order setting a deadline for filing motions to exclude defense expert witnesses. The court granted the motion in part, extending the deadline for certain witnesses, while denying it for others, specifically Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus.
Court Filing: 482
The court partially grants and denies the government's motion to preclude the testimony of two expert witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and orders the parties to propose redactions to certain documents and justify any requests for sealing by November 23, 2021.
Court Filing: 499
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 516
The court rules on the government's motion to partially preclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The court denies in part and grants in part the motion, allowing some of Dr. Dietz's opinions to be admitted while precluding others that may violate Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b).
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responds to the government's motion to preclude expert testimony fr...
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responds to the government's motion to preclude expert testimony from several witnesses, arguing that their testimony is admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence and is crucial to her constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.