Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-16789House OversightOther

Arizona State University workshop on AI and autonomous weapons references public sources

The document is a conference agenda summarizing discussion topics and publicly available references. It contains no new allegations, names, transactions, or links to powerful actors, offering no actio Focus on challenges of meaningful human control over AI systems. Discussion of international norms, agreements, and regulatory activity. Cites publicly available New York Times articles and CNAS repo

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014705
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a conference agenda summarizing discussion topics and publicly available references. It contains no new allegations, names, transactions, or links to powerful actors, offering no actio Focus on challenges of meaningful human control over AI systems. Discussion of international norms, agreements, and regulatory activity. Cites publicly available New York Times articles and CNAS repo

Tags

academic-workshophouse-oversightartificial-intelligencepolicy-discussionautonomous-weapons

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ESil Origins - ‘February 24 ~ 26, 2017 PROJECT An Origins Project Scientific Workshop Challenges of Artificial Intelligence: Envisioning and Addressing Adverse Outcomes ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY systems. Effective meaningful human control faces challenges with the interpretation and fusion of sensor signals and the understanding of humans of Al pattern recognition and inference. DISCUSSION What methods, international norms, agreements, communication protocols, regulatory activity, etc. might be harnessed to minimize challenges with destabilizations around time-criticality, automation, and gaming? How can meaningful human control be assured/inserted into key aspects of decision making? REFERENCES Report Cites Dangers of Autonomous Weapons, New York Times, Feb. 28, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/29/technology/report-cites-dangers-of-autonomous- weapons.html The Morality of Robotic War, New York Times, May 27, 2015 https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/opinion/the-morality-of-robotic-war.html P. Scharre, Autonomous Weapons and Operational Risk, Center for a New American Security, February 2016. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Autonomous-weapons-operational- risk.pdf US Department of Defense Directive 3000.09, November 21, 2012 http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300009p. pdf P. Scharre and M.C. Horowitz, An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/Ethical-Autonomy-Working- Paper_021015 v02.pdf

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300009p
URLhttps://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Autonomous-weapons-operational
URLhttps://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/Ethical-Autonomy-Working
URLhttps://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/opinion/the-morality-of-robotic-war.html
URLhttps://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/29/technology/report-cites-dangers-of-autonomous
Wire RefREFERENCES

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.