Skip to content
Case File
d-16992House OversightOther

Attorney recounts involvement in Pentagon Papers litigation and Supreme Court arguments

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017209
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage provides a personal recollection of historic legal work related to the Pentagon Papers, mentioning well‑known figures (Senator Mike Gravel, Justice Potter Stewart, Alexander Bickel, Solici The author represented Beacon Press and Senator Gravel in Pentagon Papers cases that reached the Sup Mentions a hypothetical discussion between Justice Stewart and constitutional scholar Alexander Bi

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

first-amendmenthistorical-precedentlegal-exposurehistorical-litigationsupreme-courthouse-oversightpentagon-papers
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney recounts 1960s First Amendment challenge to US Customs ban of Swedish film "I Am Curious Yellow"

The passage is a personal recollection of a historic First Amendment litigation concerning an obscenity case. It mentions no current actors, financial flows, or wrongdoing by powerful officials. While The film was seized by US Customs and banned nationwide in the late 1960s. Grove Press owned the film and hired the author to litigate. The author attempted to challenge Massachusetts obscenity statu

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement

The passage describes a campus free‑speech case and the author's personal involvement, but it lacks concrete leads on financial flows, wrongdoing by powerful officials, or novel allegations. No high‑r Students (referred to as the "Irvine Ten") were convicted for censoring a speaker. The author was asked to testify as an expert but declined. The author defends the prosecutor’s decision as protectin

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged Insider Account of Justice Goldberg and Warren Commission Conspiracy Narrative

The passage provides a first‑person recollection linking a Supreme Court Justice to the early handling of the Kennedy assassination and suggests that President Johnson and Chief Justice Warren deliber Justice Goldberg allegedly informed the author that President Johnson asked him to help convince the Chief Justice Earl Warren reportedly agreed to chair the Warren Commission to avoid political fall

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney recounts Deep Throat obscenity case and defense strategy

The passage provides anecdotal details about a historic obscenity prosecution and the author's personal stance, but offers no concrete new leads, financial flows, or involvement of high‑ranking offici Author claims to have avoided watching Deep Throat to argue for adult choice in obscenity cases. Describes prosecution of actor Harry Reems for conspiracy to transport obscene material. Notes prosecu

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged extremist cartoon commissioned by Norman Finkelstein depicting a public figure in violent parody

The passage mentions a controversial cartoon allegedly commissioned by activist Norman Finkelstein and created by a South American neo‑Nazi, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, Claims a cartoon was commissioned by Norman Finkelstein calling for the author's assassination. Describes the cartoon as a South American neo‑Nazi illustration depicting the author watching Israel Fr

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Self‑authored account of alleged criminal defamation case in Italy over criticism of a federal judge

The passage is a personal narrative describing a defamation claim filed by an Italian prosecutor against the author for comments about a judge. It contains no concrete evidence, financial transactions Author claims to have been criminally charged in Turin for statements made from Cambridge. Charges allegedly stem from criticism of a federal judge’s opinion on terrorism suspects. No specific names,

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.