Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1702House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that the court should require the defense to show prior inconsistent statements to witnesses before impeaching them with extrinsic evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b). The government also argues that if a witness admits making an inconsistent statement, further extrinsic evidence is unnecessary. The letter is in response to a court order in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1702
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that the court should require the defense to show prior inconsistent statements to witnesses before impeaching them with extrinsic evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b). The government also argues that if a witness admits making an inconsistent statement, further extrinsic evidence is unnecessary. The letter is in response to a court order in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Admissibility of extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statementsApplication of Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b)Impeachment of witnesses
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.