Skip to content
Case File
d-17066House OversightOther

Informal chat logs mentioning Chomsky and Maxwell with personal remarks

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #027556
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage consists of casual, fragmented messages with no concrete allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. It merely references Noam Chomsky and a person nam Message timestamps from December 6, 2018 Participants include an email address e:jeeitunes@gmail.com and a user 'ay' Mentions of 'Chomsky' and 'Maxwell' without context

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

personal-communicationchat-logshouse-oversightno-substantive-allegation
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing secular vs religious dogma

The document contains a casual academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confir Krauss and Chomsky exchange views on religion, secular dogma, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about militant atheism. No substantive claims about misconduct, financial flows

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

UN delayed action on Cambodian genocide while focusing on Zionism resolution

The passage provides historical commentary on UN inaction during the Khmer Rouge genocide and the passage of the Zionism‑as‑racism resolution. It mentions no current officials, financial flows, or act UN General Assembly did not address Cambodian genocide until after it ended. Prominent left‑wing intellectuals (e.g., Noam Chomsky) downplayed the genocide. Resolution 3379 labeling Zionism as racism

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Chomsky–Krauss email discussing secular dogma and academic attitudes

The passage contains only a personal email exchange with philosophical commentary and no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. It mentions no specific misc Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015. Discussion of secular dogma, American exceptionalism, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about sci

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Ehud Barak email about travel plans and biography

The passage contains only personal scheduling details and vague commentary with no concrete allegations, financial flows, or actionable leads involving high‑profile actors. It lacks specificity, novel Barak mentions traveling to New York in late August 2015. Reference to working on his biography with an editor. Casual remarks about political figures and Noam Chomsky, but no substantive claims.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions

The passage contains a casual email exchange among academics with no concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Emails involve Lawrence Krauss, a physicist, and Noam Chomsky, a linguist. Discussion centers on religious and secular fanaticism, not specific misconduct. No mention of financial transactions, government ag

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Fragmented notes with assorted names and vague concepts, marked confidential

The document contains a disjointed list of topics, numbers, and names (e.g., Bannon, Chomsky, Thiel) but provides no concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable details linking powerful a Mentions several high‑profile individuals (e.g., Steve Bannon, Noam Chomsky, Peter Thiel) without co References to “money, agreements, debt, power, wealth” are vague and lack specifics. Contains a st

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.