Email hints at Trump aide involvement in lenient plea for a sex abuser

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

EFTA00026451

EFTA02541489

Proposed Amendments to Federal Criminal Procedure Rules Following the 2004 Crime Victims' Rights Act

Proposed Amendments to Federal Criminal Procedure Rules Following the 2004 Crime Victims' Rights Act The passage outlines scholarly proposals for rule changes after the CVRA, mentioning President Bush’s signature but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It is a routine policy discussion with limited investigative value. Key insights: Mentions President Bush signing the Crime Victims' Rights Act in 2004.; Highlights the near‑absence of victim rights in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.; Proposes comprehensive rule revisions to integrate victim participation.

Academic analysis of underenforcement in corruption, sexual assault, and police use‑of‑force cases

Academic analysis of underenforcement in corruption, sexual assault, and police use‑of‑force cases The passage is a scholarly discussion of systemic underenforcement, citing studies and literature but provides no specific names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads linking high‑level officials or agencies to misconduct. It lacks novel, verifiable claims and therefore offers minimal investigative value. Key insights: Local police and prosecutors may have ties to officials, leading to underenforcement of corruption.; Bias against sexual assault victims—especially poor, minority, or LGBTQ individuals—contributes to low prosecution rates.; Police shootings and excessive force cases often go unprosecuted, reflecting bias against Black victims.

EFTA02456600