Skip to content
Case File
d-17145House OversightOther

Email from Lawrence Krauss criticizing Trump‑related NASA funding

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032520
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage contains a personal opinion email from a physicist about the Trump administration's NASA bill and budget, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates beyond the email timestamp, or Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to an unnamed recipient. Mentions a Washington Post article about Trump signing a NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Criticizes the bill as “show” and

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

policy-criticismscience-policygovernment-fundingbudgetemail-correspondencetrump-administrationnasahouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email referencing Trump NASA bill and criticism of rocket size

The passage contains a brief, informal email from physicist Lawrence Krauss mentioning a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill. It offers no concrete details, transactions, dates beyo Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to a private address. References a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at Mars landing. Criticizes the scientific merit of a r

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email chain discussing climate research, potential ASU hire, and vague references to Trump associates

The email provides limited investigative value. It mentions informal discussions about a possible confidential hire at ASU and a casual reference to "Trump people" but lacks concrete details, transact Krauss references being in Antarctica and climate research funding disparities. Mentions a confidential discussion about moving an unnamed individual to ASU. Casual mention of "Trump people" in the c

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss emails expressing concern over Trump‑era NASA funding and DOE science cuts

The passage is a personal email expressing opinion about budget priorities and potential cuts to particle physics. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or evidence of mi Krauss warns that a $900 million cut to the DOE Office of Science would harm particle physics resear He characterizes the Trump administration’s focus on large space projects as “glory‑seeking” rathe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss disparages Trump’s NASA funding push in private email

The email contains a personal opinion from a prominent scientist about a Trump administration NASA bill, but provides no concrete evidence, transaction details, or actionable leads linking high‑level Krauss calls the Trump administration’s NASA and defense spending a "show" and criticizes the focus He references a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Th

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Casual email discussing a possible visit by Johnny Depp to a private Bahamas island owned by an unnamed individual

The passage contains only informal chatter about a celebrity visit and mentions an island ownership claim without any concrete names, transactions, or evidence linking powerful actors to wrongdoing. I Email chain between a private individual (Jeffrey E.) and physicist Lawrence Krauss. Mentions a private island in the Bahamas owned by an unnamed person. Suggests inviting actor Johnny Depp to the is

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Casual email between Lawrence Krauss and private individual discussing Caribbean island invitation

The passage contains a personal invitation to visit a Caribbean island owned by an unnamed party, with no concrete details about financial transactions, political influence, or wrongdoing. It mentions Lawrence Krauss mentions a Caribbean island owned by an unnamed person. The email references a possible visit by Johnny Depp (implied) and a concert with Alice Cooper and J No specific dates, amounts

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.