Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-17217House OversightOther

Anecdotal recollection of Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody case with unrelated banter

The passage contains personal anecdotes and speculative dialogue about Woody Allen, with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no Mentions Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute Includes irrelevant conversation about dead historical figures No specific allegations, financial flows, or legal documents cited

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017369
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains personal anecdotes and speculative dialogue about Woody Allen, with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no Mentions Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute Includes irrelevant conversation about dead historical figures No specific allegations, financial flows, or legal documents cited

Tags

personal-anecdotecustody-disputeentertainmenthouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4.2.12 WC: 191694 Woody Allen vs. Mia Farrow In my article on the 10 greatest legal blunders of the 20" Century, I included on my list, the decision by Woody Allen’s lawyers to sue Mia Farrow for custody of several of her adopted children as well as the one child they conceived together. I played an unusual role in that lawsuit, in which both sides were focused heavily on the media: Woody was concerned that negative coverage, particularly of allegations involving sexual improprieties with a young girl, might ruin his career; and Mia’s concern that any coverage might hurt her children. Every legal maneuver in the case was made with an eye (sometimes two) on the media. I first met Woody Allen when he was filming Manhattan. He was given to me as a birthday present by a group of friends, one of whom knew Woody from his earlier film “The Front.” [check dates] He agreed to meet me for lunch. He didn’t know he was my birthday present. When I told him, he immediately began to speculate as to who he would want as a present: “Louis Armstrong,” he said would be his first choice. “He’s dead,” I reminded him. “Exactly,” he replied. “Jimmy Hoffa would be my second choice.” “He’s missing,” I said. “Exactly,” he repeated. He then asked me which dead person I would have wanted to represent as a criminal lawyer. I immediately replied “Jesus.” “Do you think you could have won?” he asked. “In front of a Jewish jury, maybe.” “Those biblical Jews were tough. They didn’t tolerate troublemakers like Jesus. They probably wouldn’t have liked Jews like us from Brooklyn,” Woody mused. “Yeah, but imagine how different history would be if a Jewish lawyer saved Jesus. They couldn’t accuse us of killing their Lord.” “But he wouldn’t have been their Lord, if you had won. He wouldn’t have been crucified. And without crucifixion, there’s no Christianity, so if you had won they’d be blaming the Jews for destroying Christianity.” Woody reminded me of the riff that got Lenny Bruce into so much trouble. Bruce quipped that if the Roman’s electrocuted rather than crucified their enemies, millions of Christians would be walking around wearing tiny electric chairs around their necks. 282

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email discussing Woody Allen interview footage and list of celebrity participants

The passage contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or misconduct involving high‑level officials. It merely references a legal restriction on using interview footage of Woody Allen a Woody Allen's legal team barred use of interview footage for broadcast. Sender requests a list of politicians, but no details are provided. Numerous well‑known performers are mentioned as past or pro

1p
House OversightUnknown

Anecdotal recollection of Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody case with unrelated banter

Anecdotal recollection of Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody case with unrelated banter The passage contains personal anecdotes and speculative dialogue about Woody Allen, with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no novel or investigable information. Key insights: Mentions Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute; Includes irrelevant conversation about dead historical figures; No specific allegations, financial flows, or legal documents cited

1p
House OversightMar 11, 2011

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal The passage is a promotional, anecdotal recount of Oscar season events and film festival screenings. It mentions industry figures (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, etc.) but provides no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads linking them to misconduct or illicit activity. The content is largely descriptive and lacks novel, verifiable claims that would merit investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Peggy Siegal describes her role as a publicist covering Oscar campaigns.; Mentions various high‑profile filmmakers and actors (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, Tom Hooper, Colin Firth).; Describes festival strategies and award‑season lobbying tactics.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email reveals a cache of recorded conversations with senior politicians, judges, and high‑profile public figures

Email reveals a cache of recorded conversations with senior politicians, judges, and high‑profile public figures The message lists dozens of prominent individuals (e.g., Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Vice President Biden, Elena Kagan, Henry Kissinger) allegedly recorded by the sender. If authentic, the recordings could provide leverage or evidence of undisclosed statements, making it a moderate investigative lead. However, the email lacks specifics about content, dates, storage, or distribution, limiting immediate actionable steps. Key insights: Sender claims to have taped conversations with a wide range of high‑level officials and celebrities.; List includes former presidents, vice president, cabinet secretaries, Supreme Court justice, and foreign policy veterans.; Mentions a legal obstacle with Woody Allen’s footage, indicating awareness of potential rights issues.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Lisa Neway email to Jeffrey Epstein referencing prime minister, high‑profile names and TV production budget

Lisa Neway email to Jeffrey Epstein referencing prime minister, high‑profile names and TV production budget The passage contains a casual, unsubstantiated email with vague references to a prime minister, several famous individuals, and a proposed low‑budget TV project. It lacks concrete details such as dates, amounts, or actionable connections, making it a weak investigative lead. However, the involvement of Jeffrey Epstein and mentions of high‑profile figures give it minimal relevance. Key insights: Email sent from Lisa Neway to Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) on 9/23/2014; Mentions a surprise reminder from a prime minister about a personal relationship from 1976; References potential TV production budget of $1.25 million and mentions names like Clinton, Woody Allen, Justice Elena Kagan, David Brooks, Lena Dunham

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.