Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing questioning Mr. Leopold about alleged drug habit of his twin sister
Summary
The passage provides a vague, fragmented exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking any high‑ranking official or powerful entity to misconduct. It lacks a Witness is questioned about a twin sister's alleged drug habit. Accusations of lying about a visit to a crack house in Georgia are raised. Multiple objections are raised by Mr. Leopold, indicating co
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Transcript excerpt shows obscure witness questioning about reporters and alleged drug arrest
The passage provides vague, fragmented testimony with no concrete names, dates, financial amounts, or clear links to high‑level officials. It mentions a witness, their mother and her husband Paul, but Witness repeatedly denied any contact with reporters or receipt of money. Reference to an alleged drug arrest and cooperation, but no details. Names mentioned: Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, Paul (husband of
Fragmented courtroom transcript with vague questioning about a family dispute
The passage provides only disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete names of high‑profile officials, no specific dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions attorneys (Mr. Leopold, The excerpt is from a hearing dated roughly around late 1994 (based on file name). Questions focus on a personal family dispute (someone being thrown out of a house for lying). Objections by counsel
Heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage records a confrontational dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond noting a possible Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of lying in a letter to co‑counsel. Both parties exchange threats of sanctions and accusations of obstruction. The exchange occurs during a House Oversight session (docum
House Oversight hearing excerpt showing contentious questioning of a witness
The passage records a procedural dispute during a hearing but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investigative val Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold argue over repeated questioning of a witness. The witness is accused of lying after answering the same question multiple times. No specific allegations, financial flows
Courtroom exchange featuring Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein with vague references to surveillance and name‑tag switching
The excerpt contains a disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at someone being searched for and a possible surveillance incident, but provid Witness mentions being aware that 'people were looking for me' without identifying who they were. Reference to a night when the witness and a friend 'switched name tags' – unclear relevance. Repeated
Transcript excerpt shows witness pressured on name‑tag coincidence and subpoena timing
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It hints at possible witness intimidation but lacks specifics needed for action Witness is questioned about wearing a name tag and a subpoena date. Judge or counsel (Mr. Leopold) repeatedly demands yes/no answers. Potential indication of pressure on witness testimony.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.