1 duplicate copy in the archive
Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)
The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre
Summary
The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre
Persons Referenced (3)
“GAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. SOUTHERN DISTRICT”
ROBERT W. SWEET“York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 LO310 a.m, Before? HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHILLER & FLE”
Ghislaine Maxwell“NIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Oral Argument x New York, N.Y. March”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript Reveals Potential Undisclosed Evidence and High‑Profile Connections in Giuffre v. Maxwell Defamation Case
The transcript contains several concrete references that could be pursued for investigative value: attempts to depose former President Bill Clinton; FOIA requests and alleged FBI involvement (Louie Fr Plaintiff’s counsel sought to depose Bill Clinton to establish his relationship with Epstein. Reference to former FBI Director Louis Freeh as an expert witness without a Rule 26 disclosure. Discussio
Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)
Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre
Deposition excerpts, phone logs and financial records suggest Ghislaine Maxwell was actively coordinating with Jeffrey Epstein to locate and manage...
The filing contains multiple concrete leads: (1) sealed declaration demanding Epstein’s phone records and exhibits; (2) detailed phone logs (GIUFFRE006258‑260) showing frequent calls between Maxwell a Phone logs (GIUFFRE006258‑260) capture calls where Epstein repeatedly asks Maxwell for Giuffre’s loc Maxwell’s deposition recounts urgent, “hunting” calls from Epstein after Giuffre’s disappearance,
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz and foreign leaders as admissible evidence
The filing references specific alleged contacts between Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and unnamed foreign presidents) that could link powerful actors Motion in Limine 2 asserts Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island. Motion in Limine 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents and world leader Mot
Defendant’s Opposition cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein’s island and references to Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and Prince Andrew
Defendant’s Opposition cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein’s island and references to Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and Prince Andrew The filing lists specific alleged contacts between Ghislaine Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, foreign heads of state). If substantiated, these connections could expose powerful individuals to scrutiny over Epstein‑related activities. The document provides concrete motion numbers and contexts, offering clear avenues for further document discovery and witness interviews, though the claims remain unverified. Key insights: Motion 2 alleges Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Epstein’s private island.; Motion 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz and foreign presidents.; Motion 5 addresses Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.