Skip to main content
Skip to content
Personal email exchange with no substantive political or financial contentProfessor defends against harassment allegations in university oversight document
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Confidentiality Order Limits Disclosure of [REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition in Dershowitz Defamation Case

kaggle-ho-015591

Title Match
Case File
d-17524House OversightDeposition

Confidentiality Order Limits Disclosure of [REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition in Dershowitz Defamation Case

The passage reveals a court‑ordered confidentiality seal on a deposition involving [REDACTED - Survivor] and attorney Alan Dershowitz, but provides no concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial flows, or h Dershowitz seeks to modify a confidentiality order to allow limited disclosure of Ms. Roberts’s test Roberts filed a motion to quash a subpoena and a protective order was issued, resulting in a seale

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015591
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a court‑ordered confidentiality seal on a deposition involving [REDACTED - Survivor] and attorney Alan Dershowitz, but provides no concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial flows, or h Dershowitz seeks to modify a confidentiality order to allow limited disclosure of Ms. Roberts’s test Roberts filed a motion to quash a subpoena and a protective order was issued, resulting in a seale

Persons Referenced (2)

Virginia GiuffreAlan Dershowitz

“Accordingly, Dershowitz requests that the Court modify the Confidentiality Order to confirm that Dershowitz’s counsel may d...”

Tags

confidentiality-ordercourt-filinglegal-strategydocument-concealmentdefamation-lawsuitvirginia-giuffrelegal-exposurehouse-oversight
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #015591

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Accordingly, Dershowitz requests that the Court modify the Confidentiality Order to confirm that Dershowitz’s counsel may disclose Ms. Roberts’s testimony as they deem necessary in their professional judgment in order to represent Dershowitz in this case. BACKGROUND & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dershowitz was first presented with Roberts’s heinous and false allegations against him when her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards (“Edwards”) and Paul G. Cassell (“Cassell”), filed certain now-stricken allegations in the action styled Jane Doe, et al. v. United States of America, No. 08- 80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the “Federal Action”). After Dershowitz defended himself to the media, Edwards and Cassell sued Dershowitz for defamation. The falsity of Roberts’s allegations, her credibility, and the investigation her lawyers took to assess those allegations and credibility before filing those allegations are a critical part of Dershowitz’s defense. On April 9, 2015, Roberts moved for an order “quashing the subpoena duces tecum served on her by Defendant, or alternatively, pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) for issuance of a protective order sharply limiting the scope of the subpoena” (the “Motion to Quash”). See Motion to Quash, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Roberts did not move to seal the deposition transcript and the resulting order did not seal it, but instead directed that “a confidentiality order shall be entered.” See November 4, 2015 Email from Judicial Assistant Susan Moss, attached hereto as Exhibit B and November 12, 2015 Order, attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Confidentiality Order then prepared by Roberts’s counsel and consented to by all parties includes a provision stating that “[t]he deposition testimony of Non-Party Virginia Giuffre will be designated as ‘Confidential’ and not subject to public disclosure” and that “[i]t may only be filed under seal.” See January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, attached hereto as Exhibit D.

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionJul 31, 2020

[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016

Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI

89p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 38774829 E-Filed 03/08/2016 07:20:19 PM

54p
Court UnsealedMay 28, 2021

Dershowitz Lawsuit Against Netflix

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ALAN DERSHOWITZ, | Civil Action No. | Plaintiff, | | -against - | | NETFLIX, INC., LEROY & MORTON | PRODUCTIONS LLC, RADICALMEDIA LLC, | LISA BRYANT and JOSEPH BERLINGER, | | Defendants. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Alan Dershowitz (hereinafter, “Professor Dershowitz”)

39p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein lawsuit filings reference high‑profile figures and alleged secret‑service evidence

The passage cites ongoing civil litigation that seeks to depose former President Clinton, Donald Trump, and Alan Dershowitz, and claims secret‑service records prove their presence on Epstein’s island. Brad Edwards sued the federal government under the Crime Victim Rights Act for alleged rights violat [REDACTED - Survivor] is attempting to overturn her original settlement and sue Epstein for $50 million

1p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

5/19i22, 32 PM

5/19i22, 32 PM re-( - CQbieLikkl e4s.cr,5 4r- eter: Di\lef< CI0 %) FIZCS- 1 ITC7FICW . 140 VCI AR:D Jeffrey Epstein -Mire& Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, ' Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.flag A similar $5o-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.U 91These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed-0-421 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of courtl.≥3'-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.[;3_21 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 50 40 P L lq[3‘-SE St e 'to-4 i‘.; ei•41 PCS isilClV) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice'

37p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop Five

Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED - Survivor] Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.

223p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.