Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-17655House OversightOther

Tax impact estimates for House vs. Trump corporate tax plans

The passage provides macroeconomic tax revenue projections and sectoral effects, but contains no allegations, financial flows, or links to influential individuals or misconduct. It offers limited inve Projected 10‑year revenue loss ranging from $2.4‑$3.1 tn under House plan to $4.4‑$6.2 tn under Trum Breakdown of corporate tax reforms such as lower rates, full capex expensing, and border adjustmen

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023072
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides macroeconomic tax revenue projections and sectoral effects, but contains no allegations, financial flows, or links to influential individuals or misconduct. It offers limited inve Projected 10‑year revenue loss ranging from $2.4‑$3.1 tn under House plan to $4.4‑$6.2 tn under Trum Breakdown of corporate tax reforms such as lower rates, full capex expensing, and border adjustmen

Tags

tax-policypolicy-analysiscorporate-tax-reformfinancial-impactrevenue-impacthouse-oversightsector-analysis

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Table 3: Estimated 10-year* revenue impact from tax plans, $bn Based on estimates from both the Tax Policy Center and Tax Foundation House Plan Trump Plan Corporate Tax Reform -890 to -1200 = -1940 to -2630 Lower corporate tax rate (20% under House, 15% under Trump) -1800 to -1850 -2120 to -2350 Full capex expensing, interest expense no longer deductible (mandatory under House, choice between two under Trump)** -450 to -1040 -320 to -590 Deemed repatriation of overseas earnings 140 to 190 150-200 Move to territorial tax system -90 to -160 nla Border adjustment 1070 to 1180 nla Changes to individual income/payroll taxes -980 to -2020 = -2190 to -3730 Repeal estate/gift taxes -190 to -240 -170 to -240 Total (static) estimate -2420 to -3100 = -4370 to -6150 *Tax Foundation assumes impact over 2016-2025 and Tax Policy Center assumes impact over 2016-2026 “Under House plan, Tax Foundation separately breaks out estimates for full capex expensing (-$2236) and disallowing interest deduction on new loans ($1194). Note: estimates rounded to nearest ten billion, with range to incorporate estimates from both sources. Other elements to corporate tax reform not itemized above include eliminating the AMT, repealing certain corporate tax deductions, etc. Source: Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Tax Foundation, BofA Merrill Lynch US Equity & US Quant Strategy (calculation of ranges) From a sector and industry perspective there are haves and have-nots based on each policy, but in aggregate most sectors have some puts and some takes based on tax reform. The table below shows some relevant aggregate statistics by sector that inform our subsequent analysis. Table 4: Estimated overseas cash vs. last 12 month effective tax rate vs. COGS net exports by sector Est. cash Overseas cash Effective tax Net % imported vs Sector overseas ($bn) = % mkt cap rate LTM exported COGS Discretionary 15 2.9% 28% -14% Staples 68 3.2% 29% -13% Energy 39 26% 21% -3% Health Care 187 10% 23% A% Industrials 127 6.0% 26% 1% Technology 647 14.9% 20% -9% Materials 24 40% 23% 3% Telecom 1 0.2% 29% 0% Utilities 2 0.3% 28% 0% S&P 500 ex. Financials & Real Estate 1,170 5.7% 25% 6% Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy, FactSet, Bloomberg Cutting the corporate tax rate The best starting point for analyzing corporate tax reform is the US statutory corporate tax rate, as this rate is critical in determining the impact of other proposed changes (border adjustments, interest deductibility, etc.). If the tax rate were lowered from 35% to 20% and the US moved to a territorial tax system (no longer taxing foreign profits), all else equal, we estimate an initial boost to S&P 500 EPS of 12% ($17 to 2018 EPS). However, over time, some of this benefit could be passed on to customers via lower prices — for instance, it is unlikely that there will be any major long-lasting impact from tax reform for Utilities sector profits, as any benefit/cost would likely be passed through to customers when incorporated into each company’s regulated pricing. The benefit would also be offset by some of the other changes discussed in subsequent sections. We assume that S&P 500 companies would be able to retain half of the benefit, or roughly $8 of 2018E EPS. Below, we show the estimated EPS impacts on each sector based on a tax rate of 20%. BankofAmerica <2” 4 Equity Strategy Focus Point | 29 January 2017 Merrill Lynch

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.