Skip to content
Case File
d-1771House OversightCorrespondence

The letter, written by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, requests that the court approve proposed...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1771
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The letter, written by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, requests that the court approve proposed redactions to documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial, citing concerns about protecting the integrity of the fact-gathering process surrounding Juror 50's conduct.

Tags

Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trialProposed redactions to previously submitted documentsJuror 50's conduct during the voir dire process
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightCorrespondenceUnknown

The letter, written by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the court should grant the d...

The letter, written by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the court should grant the defense's request for individual sequestered voir dire and limited counsel-conducted voir dire to ensure a fair and impartial jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense contends that the government's opposition to this request is standard procedure and that the court has the power to ensure a fair jury selection process. The letter highlights the high-profile nature of the case and the potential for juror bias due to extensive media coverage.

1p
House OversightCorrespondenceUnknown

The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan discusses the jury charge and instructi...

The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan discusses the jury charge and instructions in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, noting that the defense did not object to the court's redline of the draft jury charge and responding to a government letter regarding proposed edits.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the MDC's objection to the court's order allo...

The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the MDC's objection to the court's order allowing Ghislaine Maxwell to use a laptop computer on weekends and holidays is unfounded. It asserts that Ms. Maxwell needs access to the laptop to review the millions of pages of discovery materials produced by the government, and that the MDC's proposed solution of using the prison computer is inadequate due to its technical limitations.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The letter, filed by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, responds to the government's claims about ...

The letter, filed by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, responds to the government's claims about Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions, alleging unsanitary conditions, mistreatment, and inadequate access to medical care and legal resources. The defense requests that the court order the MDC to cease releasing Maxwell's health information and provide the defense with a video related to an incident of physical abuse. The letter details various issues with Maxwell's confinement, including lack of privacy, poor living conditions, and inadequate medical care.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This is a court filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the ...

This is a court filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document is a formal submission to the court.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim requesting that the court orde...

The document is a court filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim requesting that the court order the U.S. Marshal to allow defendant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her legal papers while in the cellblock. The court grants the request, issuing an order to permit Maxwell to have access to her legal materials during her detention.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.