Witness testimony excerpt referencing sexual history and Epstein
Summary
The passage provides a fragmented courtroom transcript with limited details—no concrete names, dates, or transactions beyond a vague reference to Epstein. It lacks actionable leads, novel information, Witness mentions being one year younger than 'Zack JJ' and two years younger than another person. Names 'Ryan' are mentioned without context. Witness denies oral sex and exchanging sex for value befo
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
“...OLD: Objection to the form of the question. 122 THE WITNESS: Yes, | had kissed people before. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Before you met Epstein, had you ever had oral sex? A. No. Q. Ever in your Jife, have you exc...”
The Witness“...never kissed a man other than those two? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection to the form of the question. 122 THE WITNESS: Yes, | had kissed people before. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Before you met Epstein, had you ever had oral s...”
Mr. Leopold“...any type of sexual activity with? Q. Are you saying you never kissed a man other than those two? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection to the form of the question. 122 THE WITNESS: Yes, | had kissed people before. BY MR....”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Deposition transcript: 2763
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of interactions between their stepfather (Paul) and reporters, as well as their mother's potential cooperation with law enforcement against Epstein. The witness denies knowledge of these events, and their attorney objects to certain questions.
Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing questioning Mr. Leopold about alleged drug habit of his twin sister
The passage provides a vague, fragmented exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking any high‑ranking official or powerful entity to misconduct. It lacks a Witness is questioned about a twin sister's alleged drug habit. Accusations of lying about a visit to a crack house in Georgia are raised. Multiple objections are raised by Mr. Leopold, indicating co
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling
The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.
House Oversight hearing excerpt showing contentious questioning of a witness
The passage records a procedural dispute during a hearing but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investigative val Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold argue over repeated questioning of a witness. The witness is accused of lying after answering the same question multiple times. No specific allegations, financial flows
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.