Skip to content
Case File
d-1776House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to court doc...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1776
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislain Maxwell. The court rejected some proposed redactions and ordered the parties to resubmit revised redactions. The document also includes excerpts from a related case involving David Parse, who was convicted of tax fraud.

Persons Referenced (3)

Tags

Redactions to court documentsMotion for a new trialTax fraud scheme
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Order and Filings: 605

The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislain Maxwell. The court rejected some proposed redactions and ordered the parties to resubmit revised redactions. The document also includes excerpts from a related case involving David Parse, who was convicted of tax fraud.

12p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approves Ghislaine Maxwell's proposed redactions ...

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approves Ghislaine Maxwell's proposed redactions to her bail application reply, finding them narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The court applied the three-part Lugosch test to determine the appropriateness of the redactions. Maxwell is ordered to docket the redacted documents by December 23, 2020.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and orders the unsealing of certai...

The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and orders the unsealing of certain documents related to her case, while allowing the parties to propose redactions to protect sensitive information. The court's reasoning is provided in a separate opinion filed under temporary seal. The order is issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2021.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, sets deadlines for the parties to propose redacti...

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, sets deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to the court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and other documents ordered unsealed. The parties are required to file a joint letter by the specified dates if no redactions are sought.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, stating that the parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case do not propose any redactions to the court's June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order or certain exhibits. The parties have no objection to the public filing of these documents without redactions.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.