Skip to content
Case File
d-17917House OversightFinancial Record

Unverified claim that Jeffrey Epstein is cooperating with federal investigators on a Bear Stearns mortgage Ponzi scheme

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021760
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage offers a vague lead that Epstein, a high‑profile inmate, is allegedly helping the government unravel a Ponzi scheme tied to former Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund managers. It lacks Epstein is described as "Victim #1" in an indictment involving former Bear Stearns Mortgage Investme Alleged loss of $67 million by Epstein in the scheme. Claims he is spending most of his time in ja

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-crimefinancial-flowbear-stearnsponzi-schemeprison-cooperationlegal-exposureunverified-sourcehouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Maldives President Mohamed Waheed Hassan Seeks Advice from Jeffrey Epstein on $4 B Anonymous Funding Deal

The email reveals a potential $4 billion anonymous fund willing to be deposited in the Maldives central bank, with a proposed special‑purpose vehicle created by presidential decree. It directly links Anonymous funds manager proposes $4 billion deposit in Maldives central bank. Funds to be lent back to the government via promissory notes and a government‑owned construction SPV Deal requires a pres

3p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe litigation references alleged secret government agreement with Epstein

The passage mentions a purported secret agreement between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no concrete details, dates, or names of officials. It is largely procedural language about jo Jane Doe plaintiffs allege a secret government agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The claim is used to support a Rule 15 motion to add additional Jane Does to the case. No specific officials, date

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Brief argues against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein on sex‑trafficking charges

The document is a legal argument urging the U.S. Attorney's Office not to pursue federal charges against Epstein. It contains no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence linking powerfu Cites Eleventh Circuit precedent on §1591 requirements for sex‑trafficking of a minor. Claims the government lacks sufficient evidence to prove Epstein's guilt. Argues that federal prosecution would

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Allegations linking Alan Dershowitz, Virginia Roberts, and Jeffrey Epstein to alleged extortion and sexual abuse claims in a court filing

The passage references high‑profile individuals (Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, a former federal judge) and claims of extortion, false accusations, and sexual abuse involving underage girls. While Dershowitz alleges a plot to extort him involving false sexual abuse claims. Virginia Roberts' allegations are tied to a declaration filed on Jan 15, 2015 against the government Reference to attempts

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein

The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal memorandum argues insufficient evidence for federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein under §2422(b)

The passage is a legal analysis that critiques the government's case against Epstein, focusing on statutory interpretation and evidentiary standards. It does not provide new factual leads, names of co Claims Epstein took steps to ensure visitors were over 18, challenging the notion of willful blindne Argues federal statutes require proof of a large‑scale ring or interstate targeting of minors, whi

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.