The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assis...
Summary
The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded, as his defense team made strategic choices regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine Conrad, and that the evidence shows Parse was aware of and involved in the tax shelter transactions.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request...
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about...
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where ...
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brie...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from...
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.